Is Twenty20 the Future....?

Question

of cricket?

i think its fun to watch, and the game is more action packed.

However, i would choose 50 over or test match over twenty20.

Even though its slow (as some people say) it's more exciting (for me) and shows the talents of the players more.

Please keep ur answers short, because i don't bother reading all those huge long essays! =D

Cricket Question - Albie Morkel OR Mitchell Johnson? (i prefer johnson =])

Answer 1

yes

Answer 2

no.

Answer 3

Yes, will be part of the future like ODI and Test.

Answer 4

wher is  your question ??

Answer 5

Twenty20... it is the future. The players can hit the ball harder and the audience actually stays awake...wide awake. Faster and stronger. World is get faster so is cricket.

Test Stinks! Down with it!

P.S. I prefer Johnson

Answer 6

T20 is like a desert flower. Starts slowly, flowers fiercely but whithers quickly - unfortunately leaving no seed; it's sterile.  

It's synthetic cricket made for attention deficit suffers and gamblers.  No body remembers the games except for finals and world cups!

Answer 7

Same here,

20-20 is definitely fun to watch but thats not the future of cricket....

There will definitely be a balance between 20/20, ODIs and Tests....

but I think we can see more of 20/20 in the future...

There you go!

Short and sweet answer....

Btw, I prefer johnson too....

Answer 8

NO IT IS NOT THE FUTURE OF CRICKET BECAUSE IT IS NOT VERY GOOD BECAUSE MANY OF THEM ARE THE PREY OF MATCH FIXING AND EVERY ONE IS NOT ABLE TO PLAY THIS TYPE OF CRICKET

Answer 9

It will be the major Format of the game.

But they would play 50 Overs & test cricket

I too prefer Mitchelle

Answer 10

even i wnt 20-20

Answer 11

While Twenty/20 form of cricket is most entertaining and exciting, ODI and test cricket will still continue to attract

interest.

As far as 2nd question is concerned, I concur with your choice.

Answer 12

its future is bright because it is a good way to earning.