Is UFC Better Then WWE?

Question

I Say Yes

UFC Has Real Blood,Real Punches/Kicks and REAL Fighting

Answer 1

i like WWE but UFC is so much better! like u said its real and u really cant predict who gonna win on WWE you usually can

Answer 2

well, that depends, if you're a soap opera kinda guy that's a bit light on the loafers, then the WWE is better, but if you like real fighting like real men, then the UFC....so which one is it??

Answer 3

it depends on what you like Wrestling is usualy more entertaining but UFC is real

Answer 4

yeah, wwe is fake and sucks ***. usc is real and exciting

Answer 5

I prefer WWE because I like the stories.

Answer 6

mcmahon is an a*****e

he ruined wrestling in the late 80's

destroyed every regional promotion there was .

Answer 7

There are only personal self likings. UFC and WWE are both very entertaining. But WWE you don't have to know about it, yuo know there getting hurt (well kids think that) and you know what They're doing. UFC takes more time to understand all the ground fighting. It is very complex.

My own opinion, I like UFC better. The reason for that is, WWE is a lot of trash talk and hate. In UFC the only trash talk is in the promotional videos. The rest is fighting. But WWE is also entertaining. People say WWE sucks because its fake. But we liek to watch movie fights, right? I like Jet Li movies am I wrong for that?

Thats all my own opinion.

Goood Luck!

Answer 8

Apples and oranges.  

I'd ask why you're even bothering to ask this question, but you're not asking a question.  You're  stating an opinion and inviting people to attack professional wrestling for being fake.  

I'm a fan of both, but I'm not going waste a lot of energy  trying to engage someone with a closed mind.  Yes, the outcome is planned, but the injuries you don't see are real, the constant travel is real, and so is the blood, because that's not ketchup.  

It's a hard lifestyle to live, and there are less punishing ways to make a living.  But it is entertainment.

Answer 9

YES!

Answer 10

What are you freakin retarded!!!  WWE is a d**n soap opera!! UFC is real fighting.

Answer 11

They are both 2 completely different stuff.

WWE is acted out. UFC is real.

It's like saying...

Is The Protector better than K-1?

Answer 12

Well, WWE, cause thats fake, and violent things are just wrong.

Answer 13

i guess this question is relative because essentially it comes down to your definition of what is "better."

that said, I prefer the UFC =)

Answer 14

well Duh!!!

No Offense but WWE is a bunch of sissies running around a ring and it is so fake

Answer 15

I don't like comparing the two. I am more interested in the UFC for all the reasons you put and more, but there are very many people who enjoy the drama of the WWE and its arsenal of various techniques. Many things they do in the ring are impossible to preform in the octagon.  Like I said if I had to pick it would be the UFC, but I can see why wrestling still has its fans.

Answer 16

Well since the UFC is REAL and wrestling is FAKE.

I say UFC.

Answer 17

this question should be is young and the restless better than WWE you shoudn't compare a Fighting show with soap opera