Is a world leader named George W Bush 43 responsible for his crimes&actions over the last 8 years?

Question

or not?

Answer 1

This is coming from a 40 year veteran Democrat, Ex-Democrat now.  Democrats have a really bad habit of jumping on bandwagons and parroting whatever tune the bandmaster is whistling because it seems to fit the moment.  Nixon was criminally charged and then pardoned as were some of the other members of the Watergate gig.  Our country has been going down the tubes economically and socially for over 6 decades now and we have had leadership of both parties in place and in charge and not one issue changed.  We started to run out of money in the 70's and Corporate America saw an opportunity to make money by starting the credit card industry.  We could charge things that we didn't have the cash for.  Hint, hint; credit doesn't make you have money.  It takes money out of your pocket!  That's why times appeared to get better, not because of who was in office.  Washington, D.C. plays by an entire different set of rules than we do.  You either play the game the way the incumbents want it played or you're dead in the water and can't get anything done.  When you hear somebody accusing Clinton or Bush of anything you can consider the source corrupt and using assumptions and fairy tales as fact and passing them on as fact.  With the internet there's no reason to not be able to get the facts from the Congressional Record or tap into C-Span and watch the action on the house floor personally.  You might worship Palosi but she is the one that made the facist statement about taking over one of our critical industries when her party can't even run an election without s******g it up.  I beleive it was Palosi who paid Sadam Husein a visit and it wasn't to soon after that that He attacked Kuwait and we had to come to the country's defense.  It was Clinton who arranged for the sale of top secret missile targeting programs to the Red Chinese, a capital offense.  Maybe we should go back and charge him for high treason?  The bullies of the world only pick on wimps that they figure they can whip without opposition, just like any other bully.  That's why Russia is making its move now.  Bush is on his way out and we have wimps in charge of Washington and a wimp and a maybe running for the White House.  If you were the bully, what would you do?  Never mind, you're on board with all those who think we should not honor any of our treaties or promises to any of our allies and split and leave them holding the bag.  That's the Democratic thing to do.  We need to quit electing people on looks and hype and look for leaders who are a reflection of our own values and that requires us to take a hard look at outselves and determine where we stand in our own lives and with our own opinions, not the bandleader's.

Answer 2

Yes he is, but his accomplices should be held responsible as well.

Karl Rove, d**k Cheney, Condy Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, just to name a few.

Answer 3

YES! George W Bush 43 is responsible for War crimes. However, GWB isn't and will never be charged. lol

Answer 4

Guys wait! Maybe terrorists picked off the field of battle DO have constitutional rights! Maybe they deserve better treatment than they would have gotten at home, without air conditioning or anything! Maybe terrorists just want to give us all hugs!

Maybe.....

Answer 5

Try as I might I can't think of a single thing he did right and many things he did that are criminal.

Answer 6

yeah we can go to war but not have healthy kids in the usa

Answer 7

He is mentally incompetent, history will eventually find out. Bush is too inexperienced to be Commander in Chief, plus he has terrible judgement.

He picked a coward for a VP and a egomaniac for his first Sec. of Defense, and then he picked a liar and a crook for Attorney General (Gonzales).

Bush is a total failure.

Answer 8

i think he should be, but it appears he is not.

Answer 9

A few specific examples of "crimes&actions" would go a long way in helping to answer this question.

Answer 10

Responsible for his crimes = yes.

Held responsible for his crimes = no.

Answer 11

He is , but not yet brought to justice.

Answer 12

WHAT CRIMES YOU DUMB ***

Answer 13

He is reponsible for his actions (as we all are) He has not committed any crimes that I know of.

Answer 14

Only in the mind of g*y leftists and the radical muslims that they hope will kill them last. I am guessing DINO is the former.  

Answer 15

let me guess....you're a liberal democrat....but the answer is NO. no crimes committed (unless you are a radical uneducated liberal)

Answer 16

Okay, you made the assertion.  Now back it up.  Name one crime GWB has committed.

Answer 17

Nope, it is all clintons fault

Answer 18

After reading replies here I understand much better how Hitler was able to get away with his crimes against humanity for so long.

Bush chose to wage an ILLEGAL war all based upon a pack of stinking lies that has seen the slaughter of over 600,000 innocent Iraqi civilians .

Bush's actions constitute crimes against humanity without question according to leading international jurists.

Bush has deliberately violated the US Constitution on a host of actions.

http://www.bushcommission.org/

http://uniorb.com/RCHECK/Rimpeach.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Khut8xbX...

The ONLY reason that Bush is not standing in the docket at the World Court in The Hague where Milosevic and now Karadzic now stand trial is there is not YET a world power that can force the arrest and prosecute Bush.

And don't give me any of that c**p about patriotism for that is EXACTLY what the n***s said in excusing their crimes against humanity and Bush is a perfect example of what a famous person wrote when he wrote the following :

"PATRIOTISM IS THE LAST REFUGE OF A SCOUNDREL"

You APOLOGISTS for Bush's crimes against humanity are no different then many Germans/n***s in WW11.  

Answer 19

I wish, and Pelosi actually gave Kucinich the go ahead to file the papers, but the Judiciary committee tabled it.  It's a no go.  It would have impeached:  Bush, Cheney, and Rove.

As for the person that blames Clinton.  I would like to point out that both Clinton and Tenet warned the Bush admin, but Bush and Rice refused to listen.  Rica actually sent it down to a third tier employee.

Answer 20

I can't believe some of you are comparing him to a n**i/Hitler. Has America really stooped that low?

Answer 21

There are videos of Bush describing how he has made himself in some instances "above the law" and so, the video describes that as a dictator.

Answer 22

??? there are 42 others? But I suppose that that 43rd is responsible for his actions as each and every one of us in the world are.... and not only for 8 years but for our entire lives...

Answer 23

Bush  should never be used in a sentence with responsible, they are opposing concepts.

Answer 24

Would be if he had committed any crimes. What has he done the Democrat Congress didn't approve and fund?

Answer 25

Em, well he did lots and lots of bad things for this country, including lying about WMD, planning the invasion of Iraq months and months before 9/11.

But hey, he didn't give any Blow ****

SO he is just fine, right?

All those dead soldiers who fought for, em what was it again??

Answer 26

While he is unpopular with many Americans, the idea of criminal actions is one that cannot be contemplated at this time.  (Impeachment being off the table as well as just what would constitute such an offense.)  History will be the judge and jury for President Bush.

Answer 27

No, there were no crimes to be guilty of.

Answer 28

Everyone should always be responsible for their own actions, unless they are mentally ill or are too young to know the difference between right and wrong.  As for crimes, nobody has shown any convincing evidence the he has committed any crime while in office,

Answer 29

unfortunately no. if it was up to me, he would have been impeached 7 1/2 years ago. being President excused him of all his inside crimes.

Answer 30

Bush 43 is indeed responsible for his actions.  That's the kind of guy he is.

But since he has not be formally convicted or even formally accused of crimes, that is just pure fantasy on your part.