it seems if it were the opposite of matter, then it would not be observable ... matter = observable , antimatter = not observable
and for that matter would it be better to just refer to the 2 as something and nothing ... "some"thing , "no"thing?
so if something (or matter) was created, then nothing (antimatter) never was created, and there just always was (funny enough the only thing that we could concieve as always existing without ever being created is absolutley nothing)
including empty space (even empty space is something)
a person might think the opposite would be a universe of infinite solid material (possible i believe, but still does not equate to nothing)
so maybe matter is imaginable , and antimatter is non-imaginable
but it's interesting that some people speculate that the 2 converging destroy one another.
i am just a novice, but my main questions, are "is it observable? and how? ... then, "would it be easier to understand if referred to as something and nothing?
Tags: