Is archaeology enough proof of dinosaurs and humans existing together?

Question

http://www.archaeologyexpert.co.uk/EarlyFootprints.html

I think it very funny to see how blind people choose to be.

LOL

Answer 1

They did find track fossils with humans walking behind dinosaur foot prints but someone destroyed them. They only have the pictures that were already taken because of the person who destroyed this.

Answer 2

The dinos went extinct 65 million years ago.  Human anscestors begin about 5 million years ago.  That 60 million years of "I seriously doubt they coexisted".  Oh also, archeaology is study of old humans, paleantology is for dinos.

Answer 3

i want a pet dino... like the flintsones :) i guess when i get a chance i'll hafta get a crocodile.... hmm how much do they cost?

Answer 4

14 Billion years ago - Universe Created (Big bang theory)

13.5 Billion years ago - Our Milky way galaxy formed

4.5 Billion to 4.6 billion - Earth Formed

3.5 billion - cynobacteria fossils (blue-green algae)

1 billion - worm like creatures

540 million - hard bodied organisms

- transition forms of soft bodied (fish, mollusks,etc)

330 million - large amphibian fossils

230 million - reptiles

155 million - small dinosaurs with feathers and wings

110 million - more bird like fossils and evolutionary paths of whales, elephants, armadillos, horses and humans

6-7 million - common ancestor of Humans and Chimps found in Africa

2.3 million -earliest species of Homo - the genus to which all modern humans evolved found in Africa

1.8 million - Homo-erectus (up right man) spred to Eurasia

200,00 years ago - Modern man

Answer 5

Those have been proven to be false.  It is an Old canard and most Creationists won't even go there anymore.

wl

Answer 6

Yes, if you look outside your window, and see a bird, which is a descendant of the pterodactyl/pterosaurs (Raptor family, such as a condor), then look in the mirror, you will have proof that dinosaurs and humans can co-exist!

Answer 7

Nope

Answer 8

There's roughly 65 million years between the evolutionary steps between them. It only happens in movies.

Answer 9

I have the picture Cranky Lady's talking about

Answer 10

Yes, so do I.  It's far more likely that the tracks were made by a dinosaur species, quite probably one whose remains we haven't discovered.  The tracks don't correspond with real human tracks.

Discovering that humans and dinosaurs coexisted does not mean just overturning evolutionary theory, by the way.  We'd have to revamp every earth science and every science that touches on living creatures.  I don't know if you're a creationist or you just like the idea of hanging out with a triceratops, but we're not talking about just giving those biologists a what-for.  The evidence for humans and dinosaurs not coexisting is so strong that, if it turns out we did, we'd really have to toss everything out and start over again.  I mean, it'd be cool, I guess, but I would avoid doctors, tall buildings, and driving over bridges after that.

Answer 11

The article you cite mentions then Laetoli footprints dated to at least 3.6 million years old, then runs on to the "Taylor trail" on the Paluxy River in Texas.

The human walking with dinosaurs tracks have been around for sometime. Contrary to "they're been destroyed" most are still known and visited.

For the Taylor site:

"The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, indistinct markings of uncertain origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved specimens (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock)."

http://paleo.cc/paluxy/paluxy.htm

Another site reported:

"In the 1930's at least one Glen Rose resident, Jim Ryals, began chiseling out dinosaur tracks from the riverbed, and selling them to tourists and passersby (Bird, 1954). Ryals also reportedly cut out some "human" prints, but evidently no one took photographs of them, and their present locations are unknown."

Perhaps these are the "they're been destroyed" prints?

"When the Taylor trail was followed the prints turned into clear dinosaur tracks. On other prints claw marks were seen "

http://hometown.aol.com/ibss3/ibss3/palu...

Even creationists have backed away from the claims: "ICR Impact article by John Morris concluded that it was improper for creationists to continue to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution. Some excerpts from this article follow.

"Due to an unknown cause, certain of the prints once labelled human are taking on a completely different character. The prints in the trail which I have called the "Taylor Trail", consisting of numerous readily visible elongated impressions in a left-right sequence, have changed into what appear to be tridactyl (three-toed) prints, evidently of some unidentified dinosaur.""

http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/scien...

Strange that after millions of years without change, the prints are now dinosaurs