Question:

Is bush responsible for 9/11 to help in get into iraq...?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

since his best friend is exxon and they made 11 billion profit this year. He also gave iraq rebuilding contracts to his friends.

 Tags:

   Report

8 ANSWERS


  1. Very simply, NO

    He's just one of the many pawns in this worldwide "show".....God is leading all the world powers by their noseholes to the great battle of Armeggedon. The war IS about the oil, and our government wants to be the "hand" on the worlds oil spigot. It's about power. So us going in and getting rid of Saddam, was a convienient way to go into that country with the intention of getting an upper hand on the Chinese, who by all rights now "own" the USA.


  2. Yeah, you need to stop believing everything you see from conspiracy nuts on the internet.

  3. President Bush wasn't responsible, but he knows who was.  Look for a geopolitical motivation including, but beyond, oil.

    If the plot began with Arabs in a cave, it didn't end there. The suits in Washington (inside and above the government) polished the plan. If there were Arabs with box cutters on those planes, they were not in control of the planes.  

    The official story is a fairy tale. The official investigation was a cover-up. The evidence for government foreknowledge and complicity is clear. Americans who cannot see that now are Americans who don't want to see it.  The majority of the rest of the free world can see it.  We look like idiots for being so blind to the obvious.

    President Bush couldn't plot his way out of a paper bag.  He was the front man and probably knew as little as necessary. They couldn't even trust him to testify before the 9-11 Commission without Cheney holding his hand to keep his story straight. What a farce that Commission was.  We need a thorough independent investigation to get to the truth before those responsible get a chance to finish destroying this nation.

  4. The answer is so obvious, absolutely. Check out the documentary loose change, you will never forget it.

  5. No.

    The US had many reasons to go in (UN violations, firing on US aircraft, etc.).

    Bush relied on bad intelligence linking Iraq to Al-Qaeda.

  6. whew!.....ya know something guys'n'gals.....believe it or not there are people in the world who JUST- DON'T- LIKE -US!...and some of that animosity has nothing to do with politics or politicians...a lot of it has to do with the fact you just happen to live in a free country,free to do what you want...jealous that you're free to criticise your country and live...some see us as spoiled,unappreciative and not deserving to have what we have(can't really blame them on that one)...those people,those countries do exist!! I've been to a couple in my lifetime..it's for real. They don't want us around and they don't want us defending countries who find themselves being threatened by them. They just don't like us. And here's a news flash..they've been around before Bush was even born, so we can't blame him! As the old saying goes,"they'd just as soon bomb us,as look at us!"...And,...they did!

  7. Think for a moment...who owns Exxon?

    Teachers, union workers......everyone that owns stock or has a 401k.

  8. If he were, that would mean he is much smarter than liberals give him credit for.  The short answer is no.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 8 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.