Is cloning humane?

Question

Should human cloning be allowed? Is it humane?

And your reasons for thinking so.

Answer 1

There are ethical/Moral issues to be consider before human cloning would be allowed by our society a few of them are;

: What Individual or Social Benefits Might Human Cloning Produce?

: Would the Use of Human Cloning Violate Important Moral Rights?

: What Individual or Social Harms Might Human Cloning Produce?

Human cloning could only be allowed first it has to pass the big social norm issue and second if the society accepts its pros and cons etch... Us of this time human cloning would be contest by the majority if not all of civil community because of its not acceptance yet (not closing the posibility).

For me it is consider Humane bacause its just replication another copy of the same individual. Compared to the generically motified coz theres already an alteration of genes and it is still debatable depending on the case.

Answer 2

i dont think it should be allowed

we've been fine for the last couple of centuries without human cloning, and im pretty sure we can continue without it

and i dont think its humane

Answer 3

Yes

Answer 4

No.

Answer 5

is it even possible?????????

Answer 6

I don't know how anyone can say something is not ethical or moral without knowing anything at all about it, for certain. The government tells us that human cloning has not occurred, for whatever that's worth.  If human cloning has not occurred, what can we say we know about it, for certain?  Not a d**n thing.  It is that "flat-earth, earth-centered universe" thinking that writes ideas off without the slightess consideration to truth.  If we actually cloned a few human beings and evaluted them over a period of time and found that our fears were vindicated, that would be one thing.  But to just buy into government and religious propaganda without question, is just foolishness.

People are "told" that a human clone would be just a delayed twin; which commonsense would suggest is true.  But how offen has commensence missed the mark?  Often enough. The embryogenesis, and the quantum nature of consciousness, along with human twin studes all suggest that a human clone would be something truly "unique."  It would not be a mere delayed human twin.  It would, over time, become one and the same as the genomic donor that provided the DNA for cloning. The two would likely become the same "person."  Now, that is a very hard concept to phantom.  Our minds are not conditioned by evolution to see the world from more than one perspective. Human twins can, to a limited degree.

As for cloning be humane, we are dealing with a truly unique situation in which we have no experience with.  How are we to determine if its humane or not if we don't develop it and findout what it's actually all about?  Maybe we might find that it is inhumane not to clone humans.

Human cloning will be, in my opinion, our first significant step at mastering our own biology; thus, opening up whole new worlds of possibilities.

See: Biosystems as conscious holograms

http://www.emergentmind.org/PDF_files.ht...

Human Cloning Commentary

http://www.reproductivecloning.net/open/...

Issues with Animal Cloning

http://www.echeat.com/essay.php?t=32069

O.A.,. Embryonic Holography

http://www.geocities.com/nwbotanicals1/o...

ANIMAL CLONING: The Science of Nuclear Transfer

by Joseph Panno, Ph.D

ISBN: 0-8160-6882-8

CLONING: The Road To Dolly, And The Path Ahead

by Gina Kolata

ISBN: 0-688-15692-4

Answer 7

Yes it should be allowed. Think of the possibilities. If someone loses an arm, you can clone one and reattach it. Plus it will be a giant leap forward in modern research. I think its more humane then abortion as you are making new life. Sure its not natural but i see this as a good thing.