Is feminism fundamentally flawed?

Question

as it uses scant empirical data for its' often sweeping generalisations and stereotypes?

As a humanity it shuns scientific and or statistical methodology for evidence- and many arguments are based upon other theoretical/academic arguments metaphorically a rickety house of cards?

It is based primarily on an American born white Christian/Jewish educated middle-class female's experiences thus is inherently classist and bigoted as it generally excludes non moderately affluent females, who maybe poor or v wealthy white, other races or non Judeo-Christian?

It is over-represented by generationally modaretely affluent Jewish academics- such as Gertrude Stein, Gloria Steinem, Liz Wurtzel etc- who lack the highly complex amalgam REAL life experiences of women outside their immediate peer group?

Has feminism measurable improved 3rd world women's lot or has empirical education, Western science and medicine done far greater-

If not then is feminism not only redundant but self-congratulatory?

Answer 1

Feminism is flawed as a movement because it is entirerly reactionary in nature. It can only exist in conjunctutur with its oposite as equality rises it becomes less and less valid, when no ones trying to opress you you have nothing to fight.