Is global warming true????

Question

is this true because in canada it has been the coldest winter yet and its still pretty chilly in canada.

Answer 1

No, the media believes anything Al gore says is gospel.

Answer 2

It isn't global warming any more.  It is now global climate change.

In the 70s we were going into an ice age and if we didn't park all our cars, we would all freeze by the 80s.

In the 80s we had ozone depletion and if we didn't quit launching rockets we would all be dead from skin cancer by 2000.

Now since the global warming c**p has subsided and scientists have filed suit for fraud against Al Gore it has become climate change.

As rational human beings we simply have to accept that there are irrational human beings and those people have to have some sort of a crisis or their life is incomplete.

When you evaluate the claims and observe the people involved it is almost a religion.

So is there global climate change, well there have been global climate changes for hundreds of millions of years, I suppose we will still have them.  But, rest assured, industrialization is not the cause.  We had a little ice age recorded while the closest thing we had to industry was a few wood cook fires.  Sleep well and ignore Chicken Little, the sky is not falling.

Answer 3

yup ya it is. but it depends on the part of the world you are in. like the ozone layer isnt affecting canada...yet lol. it could be very chilly but global warming is true, believe or not. but dont worry bout it. it aint gonna happen in your lifetime or ur kids'

Answer 4

YES=http://www.socyberty.com/Activism/Fi...  THIS IS THE WAY TO START TO DELETE IT, PREFERRABLY BY GETTING GROUPS FROM SCHOOLS, CHURCHES ETC. AND WORKING TOGETHERS IN THE SANDS OF TIME THATS NEVER BEEN TOUCHED BY MAN AND ENJOY THE TREASURES YOU'LL FIND AS YOU HELP TO DELETE GLOBAL WARMING.

Answer 5

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/glo...

Global warming is but a component, in a group of destructive forces at work such as ;deforestation,desertification,soil and water contamination ,irresponsible or wasteful utilization of bio resources , air pollution,Non sustainable Agriculture,over pumping carbon aquifers

all concepts which are definitely not part of the Natural Processes of the Natural world

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

WHICH WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR,

The most prolific growth on this planet is part of the day in the mist and most of the time under clouds ,and the least growth is always directly in the sun .

To exchange the one for the other means changing local climates

We are exchanging Nature with Tar , concrete and open spaced mono cultures.

In 300 years half of the planets forests have gone ,and in the last 50 years half of the wet lands ,and rain forests

These Areas absorb heat during the day and release heat at night ,

Cause cloud formation(shade).humidifying the air on the surface as well as releasing excess water at the roots that keep rivers flowing ,which in turn brings more water into the Environment .

As well as contributing to absorbing carbon emissions as do the leaves of the trees together with the oceans .

All in all many factors which directly affect the local Environment .

The loss of the above resulting in rivers drying up ,less rain ,desertification,loss of habitat for many species and so on.

dryer and hotter surface environments which can manifest in different weather patterns such as tornadoes or bush fires

I may be stupid or Naive but somehow i believe that lots of these local environmental changes, can add up to affect global weather, If there are enough of them (and there are)

And then on top of that comes the story of the effects of pollutants released into Nature and especially the Air ,by MAN http://earthissues.multiply.com/photos/a...

A cocktail of events and a lot of the ingredients have MAN written all over them

So it is safe to assume that we should look at ourselves ,just a teeny bit ,for possible improvements ,and rectifying Eco errors that are with in our powers.

What is a safer bet

to be or not to be

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Answer 6

I doubt it.

But I would never use the temperatures in any one year to argue against global warming.

Longer answer:

While I don't believe in the AGW theory (Anthropogenic Global Warming, that is, that carbon dioxide and other byproducts of a petroleum-based technology are driving a kind of greenhouse effect that seriously alters temperatures.) I do have to admit that there has been an observed warming trend throughout the 80's and 90's. But part of what makes me doubt the carbon connection is that this trend seems to have stopped. Temperatures have been stable for the past few years.

This I believe, not because I feel any warmer, here in Houston, Texas, but because this is a consensus on an empirical measurement  by scientists of the world. Including those who oppose the idea that pollution is causing it, or that it is a serious environmental problem.

The actual amount of warming is in fractions of a degree farenheight, and something like three degrees celcius. So, you would be unlikely to feel a difference or notice a difference either way in daily or yearly weather reports.

In fact, the actual temperature in any one year would not be noticeable. The hottest and coldest temperature in any place can be off by more than four or six degrees celcius from any one year to the next.  So that's not what people who talk about "global warming" are talking about, they are talking about a trend, that they are afraid will continue and accelerate.

I don't think they have enough information to predict a continuation or acceleration of this trend. Especially not now, when temperatures have shown no trend for a few years.

If the trend towards warmer temperatures resumes, and if it goes on for, say, four or five years at a similar or accelerated rate, then I may have to change my position.

But if the trend remains halted during that same period, or begins to reverse at a similar or higher rate than the temperature increase of the 80's and 90's, then I would expect the people who are now warning about global warming to change their tune and start looking hard at what mistakes led them to predict the crisis and try to stifle debate.

Answer 7

it is from effect that.

Answer 8

Global warming is a natural phase of Earth, caused by some Solar Activities by Sun. We human don't have to bother about it. Some of the environmentalist says that this is because of the CO2 we are emitting into the environment, but the reality is that we are just contributing towards 1% to 10% of actual global warming.

If the actual cause of Global Warming is CO2 emitted by the humans then why Global Warming occures on other planets. Just Google for "Global Warming on other planets" and see the results, there are no humans on other planets.

Having too little CO2 in the environment will cause for the plants to die more early, more over it also cools down the temperature on earth.

Having too much CO2 (obiviously, not caused by humans. Mostly generated in the Sea/Oceans) will lead to Green House effect and will lead in increasing the temperature on Earth.

So, the best is to plant more trees so that there would be a balance for the consumption of CO2 on the planet.

I personally think that instead of thinking on this baseless issue try to think on what if Nuclear War broke out in the world, it will destroy Earth more rapidly.

So, next time whenever somebody says you about global warming, just ignore it.