An atheist who is open to evidence and argument is merely waiting for a Christian to bring forth cogent arguments and substantial evidence to support his case for the belief in a God, and specifically a Christian God. If theists fail to provide good arguments and evidence, why should an atheist be condemned for the incompetence of those who follow God? Isn’t that unjust of God, if he does exist? I mean you wouldn’t find it fair for a father to punish his son for not being able to understand Spanish, if that same father sent a person to teach his son Spanish, who himself could not speak the language? How about a more apt analogy? If a father knew that his son was in peril out in the wilderness due to an imminent attack by bears, and instead of getting his son himself, he sent a stranger, that the son did not recognize, into the wilderness and that stranger told him that he is his father’s friend and that he was told to by his father to bring his son home, should the son be held accountable for not believing the stranger? The son, being skeptical of strangers, as all cautious good boys should be, would and should rebuff the stranger. Now would it be fair of the father to let his son be mauled by bears out in the wilderness because the son was naturally skeptical of the stranger. Wouldn’t it make sense for the father, who is more than capable of fetching his son himself, to get the son so that he is not victimized by his own skepticism?
Tags: