Is it True Sarah Palin's Disabled Child is actually her Daughter's Teen Pregnancy coverup?

Question

I read on article that Sarah Palin never looked pregnant and that her 16 year old daughter was showing sign's of pregnancy and that her mom may have taken in the her baby as her own and lied about it being her's to the public

Answer 1

yes it is.

Answer 2

Here I am!!! Its true! Its true! I have 2 mommies.

On sale Wed

Answer 3

she looks pretty pregnant in this picture down at the bottom taken in march. http://alaskareport.com/news31/z49194_re...

it just shows how democrats will go to great lengths to win this election even if it means taking down a nice and wonderful family. this is truly sick and low that people would make up a rumor likes this. like i said it is sad and i am glad i am not a democrat.

PROUD REPUBLICAN

MCCAIN/PALIN 08'

Answer 4

No.  She almost had the baby in Texas while she was at a conference.   See KTUU story below.  Palin is a nut.  She showed a shocking lack of judgment to, after breaking her water in Texas, attend the conference and then take an 8 hr flight back to Alaska so her baby could be born 'an Alaskan'.  Given me a friggin break.

On the other hand...  it would explain the whole going into labor and jumping on a plane insanity.   She's not insane, just a liar.  

Either way, It shows terrible judgment of John McCain to have picked a person with such terrible judgment.

Answer 5

I assume that the Far Left Liberals have no morales.

Answer 6

There is enough to rip Palin about without smears.  

I realize it is tempting to counteract the Schmidt/Rove Swift Boat lie machine, but let's hold ourselves to a higher standard than that scum.

If you have credible evidence of what you suggest, post the source.

Otherwise, you will be assumed to be an out of touch Obama supporter or a McCain supporter trying to push him through reverse psychology.

Source?

Answer 7

Oh for God's sake.  Just because Republicans make up stuff about Obama's birth certificate and being a Muslim doesn't justify c**p like this.  Let somebody else spread rumors about a mother of five with a disabled child.  Democrats don't need the headache.

Answer 8

NO!!  Don't target people's children.  It's classless and tacky.

Answer 9

yes

Answer 10

No.  Of course she didn't lie about having a baby to cover up her daughter's pregnancy.  

    

The Governor,a vocal anti-choice Republican, chose to return to Alaska to have her 5th child despite the following risk factors:

1.  She was leaking amniotic fluid (her water broke)

2.  She was 44 years old, a risky age for childbirth.

3.  The baby she was carrying had known "special challenges" (down syndrome)

4.  The child was one full month premature.

5.  She flew from Texas to Alaska on a commercial airline (Alaska Airlines) while while leaking amniotic fluid, a 10 or more hour flight depending on the length and location of her layover.

6.  She did not inform any of the airline staff of her condition.

However, Gregg Erickson, a reporter from the Anchorage Daily News, told the Daily Kos that the rumors had been investigated and debunked.  

So it appears that these behaviors are not those of a person faking/covering up a pregnancy but merely those of someone with terrible, terrible judgment.

Answer 11

Dont know but it is possible.

Answer 12

Cool, if that is true, then she truly is just like all of us, and I would respect her even more.  This would indicate that her family is not immune to the same problems that we all face and she is doing what she needs to do to care for the baby.

Answer 13

I'm a Democrat but I've been disgusted with fellow Democrats. How can Democrats claim to be the MORAL party when they make false accusations against Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin to get Barrack Obama elected. It seems to me that some Democrats have dropped the ball this and women politcians are the biggest loosers.

Answer 14

i bet you wouldn't say that to her face,she'd kick your little a$$ for you.                                                                                        edit :i guess she should have murdered the child instead,you know to score some points with the barry o. crowd.

Answer 15

responding to justgetitright:

Dude, age risk factor only applies to first-time-mothers. Have you heard of Down syn. kid with FOUR normal siblings?

By the way, here is the math :18 April 2008 (36 weeks) – 17 Dec 2007 = 18 weeks and 2 days pregnant. But Sarah mentioned "one and only son in Iraq".

Either she was assuming babies to be unisex (neither son nor daugher), or she had no idea of baby Trig during that interview.

Answer 16

It is virtually unheard of for a 16 year old to give birth to a down's syndrome child, yet much more common in women in their 40's.  Secondly, it would make sense to test a woman of Mrs. Palin's age for the potential risk of a down's child, yet you would not do so with a 16 year old.  As we all know, prenatal testing was done and it was determined that the child would be born with this disability.  

I can't believe people would even shoot their mouths off on this subject without the least bit of consideration as to obvious points such as this.  However, with politics, I guess truth doesn't really matter, right???

Answer 17

For those who do not like her or the Republican party as a whole, that little tidbit of information would be perfect if it were true!

Unfortunately rumors like that about either party are only ploys to taint the party whom they oppose.

I am for Obama/Biden, and I still doubt the authenticity of that particular rumor.

Answer 18

I actually thought that this was just some crazy left wing lunatic coming up with stuff. But after looking at the evidence, this could be a potential scandal brewing. Before anyone dismisses this as being different, do research and check it out. It could be nothing, but it could be something. If its true, McCain has the worst vetters in the history of presidential politics. Trust me this is not a conspiracy theory, but very suspicious.  This one guy from youtube breaks it down as best as any article I've read.

Answer 19

Here is the article. I'm just the messenger here.

http://dailykos.com/story/2008/8/30/1213...

Answer 20

Well..., unless you link the source , Its all hear say..

Stop stirring the c**p already !

  

Answer 21

I believe the issue about the baby being Sarah's daughters child is just a smear since the child has Downs Syndrome. At Sarah's age birth is more risky and age of the mother is a major factor in Downs Syndrome.

Sarah was aware of the baby's condition prior to giving birth but as a pro-life person she was compelled by that belief to deal continue the birth.

Answer 22

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/...

Answer 23

LMAO You read and article  wow we should be impressed You read and article. You liberals are sad bunch... Really sad bunch

Answer 24

mccains ticket

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/...