Is it a fault if opponent isn't ready to receive?

Question

If I serve and my opponent isn't in a ready position (ie knees bent) is it a fault or a let?

I would really love a response by today since I have a test over small rules like this tomorrow.

Answer 1

If they make no effort to return the serve and indicate that they are not ready it is a let.  If they make any attempt to return the serve the point stands.  See rule 29 in the Code section of the USTA Friend at Court below.

Answer 2

it would be a let call.

Answer 3

it would be a let.  however the server dictates the speed of play. so if he is taking to long to get ready for the serve you can give him a warning, and take points

Answer 4

It would be a let... i supposed for you need to let your opponent be ready everytime you serve... an implied rule in tennis...

Answer 5

IF THE SIGNAL THAT THEY R NOT READY(IE. HAND UP IN THE AIR) THEN U MUST TAKE 2!

Answer 6

i think if your opponent is not in a ready position when you're serving, and your serve is good, that's one point for you. but if your opponent raises her hand b e f o r e you serve, then it should be a let. good luck with the test. hope it helps :)

Answer 7

It would be a let.  Good luck on the test.

Answer 8

You shouldn't serve if your opponent isn't ready.

The same goes for your opponent if you're not ready to receive serve. Players should let the server know if they're not ready to receive serve, either verbally or putting their hand up.

You would play a let.

It is true that you should be playing a the server's pace but unless the receiver is intentionally stalling, there's not too much you can do about it unless it is unreasonable. Then a warning might do.

Some people play just play very fast. I know I do. I'm often waiting for the receiver to get ready to receive my serve.