Is it better to have a tough President or a really nice one?

Question

Is it better to have a tough President or a really nice one?

Answer 1

A Smart one.  Mcinsain is smart, but McBush? Palin dosn't qualify for ****

Answer 2

You need both to have a great president.  I pick neither.

Carter was too nice, Bush talked too tough.

Answer 3

By really nice, do you mean "diplomacy"?

Ha, what a concept.  

Answer 4

if you dont like your way of life...you should vote for the one that goes to other countries and campaigns..cause what they think of our presidential candidates matter right? after all we want someone that the rest of the world will walk all over...mccain/palin 08

Answer 5

It's best to have a president who is strong, wise, and willing to listen.  Sounds like Obama to me.

Answer 6

neither one of these attributes constitutes a great presidential leader...really

my opinion

Answer 7

Better to have one who can be either one when they have to. And in truth, I've gotta be honest. I think both candidates meet that qualification in this election, even though I'm a strong Obama supporter.

Answer 8

I prefer one that plays golf or fishes a lot.  They are more harmless that way.

The U.S. was never safer than when Monica Lewinsky worked at the White House.  The current exec would certainly benefit us by taking up a hobby, other than invading countries.

Answer 9

Jimmy Carter was nice, Regean was tough

you pick

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtpdPYyLk...