Is it ethical for one man to have 2 stakes whale another man is starving ?

Question

Is it ethical for one man to have 2 stakes whale another man is starving ?

Answer 1

Ethics is a word buttwipes use to justify evil. Of course it is wrong not to share if you can or should. It does happen, though. The person with two steaks adopts ethics that allow him not to care, not to share. The person with no steak adopts ethics that require sharing. Both are right. Ethics is a very flexible word-- use it any way you like.  The modern definition of "ethics" should be "the action that fits my needs".

Answer 2

If he is eating and sees a man starving, he should show compassion toward the poor man, because there is a story of lazarus and the rich man, lazarus went to heaven and the rich man went to the hot place.

Answer 3

I've never staked a whale.

Answer 4

I can only assume that you mean 'steaks' and 'while'.

The answer is, quite simply, 'yes'.

IF the human race were dedicated to the well being of it's fellow man, then we wouldn't have this problem.  However, since most people are basically selfish, giving away food won't solve anything.  

Think on this:  One man went to the trouble of raising the cows, slaughering them, aging the meat and slicing it into thick steaks.

The other man did nothing.  He sat around, waiting for a hand-out.  So...why should we reward the lazy guy?

Yes...I know...there are people with a real need.  However, there are many more who are simply to lazy to get off thier butt and earn a meal.

Answer 5

No, IT is a reflection of how selfish and evil mankind is

Answer 6

stake the whale, eat it, then stake the other guy.

Answer 7

It's unethical; whales are an endangered species, so eating whale steaks is bad.