Is it just me or is Raikkonen rubbish in the wet?

Question

I mean I know that nobody is incredible in the wet, but every time it rains it just seems that Raikkonen puts in a poor performance. What do you think?

Answer 1

certainly not a wet driver

Answer 2

Hes not at his best that's for sure, but not many drivers are. When I was at the Nurburgring last year we were right opposite the pit entrance and well, how close he came to smashing into the wall was unbelievable. he went into the pits but couldn't make the corner and bounced back out onto the track again. he was so so so lucky to get away with that.

Answer 3

well he does suck during rain, and unfortunately ferrari also sucks in monaco. so rain+monaco=c**p for kimi

Answer 4

from the past we can easily arrive at a point that kimi performs very badly on wet circuits..

Answer 5

Raikonnen was c**p at monaco

he should get a ban for what he did to Sutil

3 races should suffice

itll teach him not to use other cars as  cushions

Answer 6

kim was ok it was his set up on the car that let him down nobody including the drivers throught it would rain when thursady and friday were lovely dry warm days.

Answer 7

Raikkonen would be better in the snow ( Finland)  put some skis on his car and he will be fine.

Answer 8

Well, I was quite surprised at his performance, thought he could do better than that.

Answer 9

Hes not the best in the wet, like Alain Prost in a way.

He did win the 2005 Belgium GP, that was wet for about 20 laps, the only race yet Toyota should of won, but Ralf went for dry tyres too early......

He would of Finished 4th yesterday if it wasn't for Ferrari leaving it to late to put his tyres on and not sliding into Sutil......