Is it not advisable to change 20 overs matches to 25 overs?

Question

25 overs match will give better overall control of aggressiveness better display of skills better enjoyment of watching the game and more value to the money as it will be less subject to uncertainty

Answer 1

NO

Answer 2

yes....u r correct in ur observation......

20 overs is too less for the lower and middle order batsmen to show thier skills.......

25 overs is the way to go......

Answer 3

20 overs will be nice.

Answer 4

I agree with you entirely. To me 20 over match is nothing but a joke. This format takes away the skills factor from the game and encourages the batsman to hit every ball like a maniac and the poor bowler feels helpless against a crazy batsman who wants to hit every ball out of the park. In childhood we played cut-a-run where you have to score a run every time you touch the ball with the bat. What is new here in 20/20?

Answer 5

I think 20 is ideal as seen recent T20 matches with lot of fire works from all team

Answer 6

I agree T25/25 will be better.

Answer 7

chio chio fra 5 minuti part o vapurett

Answer 8

JUST DIFFERENCE MADE IS SCORES IN T20 WOULD BE 200  AND T25 WOULD BE 250

Answer 9

I do not find any particular advantage of increase the oversto 25.

If the overs are to be changed, it cannot be termed s Twenty/20, bu Twenty Five/25.

Answer 10

No, I wud like ta see 20/20 go away altogetha. But if yur gonna change it  why not just get back ta 50 ova games?

Answer 11

Excellent idea. Why not have a T25, T30, T35, .........

We will have specialists for each version.  Each country will have 17 teams to play in each version.

And since we are here, let's also have a 4 day test and a 6 day test.

A T20 with two innings will be the next logical step.

All in favor, say aye

Answer 12

No not at all . 20 overs is just peerfect.

Answer 13

What would be the point of that? The point of 20/20 is to smack the ball around and have a bit of a slog in an aggressive manner to see who has the patience and skill to achieve a match winning total in a limited amount of overs. If you add more overs to it you would just get the mid game lull that you have in 50 over cricket where nothing much happens. And that would be tedious.

Leave it as it is, cricket has already undergone so many changes in the last few years, we don't need any more.

Answer 14

I don't think so. Instead, We can make pitches where bowlers get some assistance. We will not have scores of over 200 so frequently in T20. Both the department of the game will be tested. Right now the poor bowlers are being thrashed around. I hope somebody is listening.

Answer 15

No not needed!T20 is ok!!