Question:

Is it not ironic that?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

the mc Canns blame the PJ for obstructing the process of finding Maddie. That now they are not longer `arguidos`, they say they just want to find Maddie, but had they not exhibited such crass stupidity with their three children on the evening of May 3rd 2007, Maddie would not currently be missing.

 Tags:

   Report

8 ANSWERS


  1. Exactly. Who is responsible for the welfare of their children?? But they will say and do anything other than accept they are fully responsible. As for looking for the child, 14 month down the line is leaving it a bit too late!


  2. Well i agree, i think its time someone sat them down and spell it out to them that they are to blame for what happened that night. They cant keep going around blaming people for there mistakes its unhealthy :)

  3. Exactly, if you leave 3 children alone then you have to expect that something may happen to them, they may vomit and choke, fall out of bed and bang their head or they may be taken by a bad person who has been watching them and waiting for the opportunity that you've just handed them.

  4. why has it never been suggested that the girl just walked out and got into trouble near the sea

    the portugese should sue them for all the money and tourism they have cost portugal . it was the parents  fault madeline disappeared they should of taken care of her

  5. They may no longer be "Arguidos ", but they seem to have

    done  Very Well , financially from their attention seeking Celebrity Status , Irresponsible Parenting ,& Child Neglect.

  6. Its always easier to blame others for your own actions . It eases the guilt

  7. I believe they are irresponsible parents and should be charge with gross negligence for leaving their children unattended.

  8. anne s ... i can answer your question.. they completlely dismissed the idea that Madeleine wandered off and got into trouble because a) Madeleine would NEVER do that ..Kate KNOWS that (as she stated in a interview) and b) cuddlecat was placed high on a shelf that a child couldnot reach (again as stated by kate)  ....but now apparantly... the b) part of the answer is invalid cos gerry found cuddlecat placed neatly by Madeleines pillow, in a neat bed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND NO-ONE CAN EVEN TRY AND GUESS AT A REASONABLE EXPLAINATION FOR THESE TWO DISCREPANCIES!!!!!!!!!!!!

    go figure hun..cos i can't!!! ;-) xx
You're reading: Is it not ironic that?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 8 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions