Is it possible that god is the big bang, on the scientific standards...?

Question

You see, me and my RE teacher were arguing a few month ago, and I'm a strong athiest... She was telling me how everything had a plan and how it's amazing that tree's breathe in what we give out and vice versa... I told her that everything could just be a coincidence, as she said, everything is possible in a world like ours,

What if god were the big bang, god was just their way of saying it...? Everything that happened, just... happened! But the big bang was still god. I'm only 13, but this is the only way i can think of that makes god, be every where and everything all at the same time.

My original theory is that we don't exist, that we were what could have been, that we are a lone universe, no parallel one.

it seems pretty pointless to me, to live and die... just to forget everything you've ever done, but then again, its just a coincidence we happened, right? its just a coincidence we havent found life on other planets... well, thts just me ramblin on, please answer (:bye

Answer 1

Ask your teacher if she thinks  God knows that showing up would end atheism forever?

Answer 2

God is God.

Answer 3

It's not a coincidence that you "just happened". The "Big Bang" is just a scientific myth. There is no scientific proof that there ever was a big bang! Scientists try to get people to believe that theory because they don't want people to believe in God.

Just think for a minute, If there was no God, then who would be the "big dogs" in the universe? The scientists would be. If you learn enough science and think with an open mind, you will come to the conclusion than not only The is the Big Bang  scientifically impossible, but all of the myth of evolution is scientifically impossible also.

That was what your teacher was trying to get you to see; that the Theory of Evolution is scientifically impossible. The only possibility left is that God created the universe and also created you.

Your life does have meaning because God loves you and when your body dies, the real you will continue to live.

You talk about coincidence. There are mathematical laws concerning coincidence. They are called the laws of probability. If you toss a coin 100 times, the probability is that it will be "heads" about 50% of the time and "tails" about 50% of the time.

If you tossed a coin and it turned up heads 20 times in a row, that has a certain probablity and could just be a coincidence. If you tossed a coin 100 times and it came up heads all 100 of those times the probability that it was coincidence would be very small.

If you were shooting dice in Las Vegas you would say that the dice were fixed. If you tossed a coin 1000 times and it came up heads every time you would know that it could not be a coincidence and that something was wrong with something.

The scientists that would have you believe that everything exists because of chance or coincidence are asking you to believe that you could toss a coin a billion times and it come up heads every time. The mathematical laws of probability say that the probibility of that happening would be zero. So would your commom sense.

If you have something that is designed, it must have a designer. All of your clothes were designed by someone. It is impossible for cotton balls to have accidently fallen off of the plant and the wind twisted them around and turned them into a pair of "designer jeans".

That is what the scientists who preach evolution would have you believe. (Many scientists say that the Theory of Evolution is impossible).

The probability that an apple fell off of an apple tree and turned into a wedding dress before it hit the ground is more probabile than for a bolt of lightening to hit water (the same kind of water than comes out of your kitchen tap) and turn into the first living cell.

This cell would have to have a semipermeable outer membrane, a nucleus that had another semipermeable membrane and the right DNA in the nucleus so that the cell could divide and become more cells. The mathematical probability of that happening is "ZERO".

I love you sweetheart, and so does God. Please don't let the secular scientists mess with your mind for their own self aggrandizement.

Answer 4

I thought a similar thing when I was you age!

Any way, this ought to help.

______

Our concepts have targets: My concept of a Blue-Jay (and yours) has a target, namely an actual blue North American bird that is commonly reffered to by the English-term 'blue-jay'. The concept of 'God', though' is typically in Judeo-Christianity, 'An omnibenevolent, omniscient, omnipotent, eternal being'. So, if that concept 'God' has a target, it will be a thing that is omnibenevolent, omniscient, omnipotent, and eternal. That is, it would a great being according to many. Yet, if the big bang certainly wasn't eternal, nor all-loving, so it seems it cannot, by definition, be the target of a concept of 'God'.

I think life is more purposeful knowing that we die: why pick to do anything at any time if you exist eternally! There seems to be no reasonable way to have a preference for doing anything at all...If we exist forever, it just seems like anything we do will be mundane, or else anything we could do is just pointless, because there are an infinite amount of things we could possibly have done instead. What would make certain actions meaningful if you existed forever? It seems like nothing would.

Answer 5

the monist theory pretty much states that god is the unmoved mover...that is to say god is that which without being a participant set all matter in our physical universe in motion (sometimes referred to as the big bang).We being mostly empty space with mere faith holding our pieces together in order have a form(physical embodiment) to brag about have a certain requirement or basic need for the concept of a higher being in order to simply justify our struggling and curious existence... I think we may in fact be the cosmos little tools and are being used for a conceptual elemental self awareness. Basically we are the universe looking in the mirror.

Answer 6

God is Energy.

How a person understands Energy is how they understand God.

If Energy for you is divine Love, you understand God as divine Love.

If Energy for you is creative Mind, you understand God as creative Mind.

If Energy for you is impersonal, geometric, precise, lawful, then God for you is impersonal, geometric, precise, and lawful.

In each and every case, the person is the instrument or viewing station through which God is perceived.

As you develop and understand Energy, you may find your perceptions and hence your opinions changing.

This happened to Dr. Anthony Flew, once the foremost atheist philosopher of all time.  He recently concluded that there was significant evidence supporting some intelligence in the universal structure of things.

His "There Is a God:  How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind" is worthwhile.

Btw, logically it is impossible to support the particular atheist position that claims "God is not," as it is impossible to prove such a universal negative.

Also logically, it takes only one "white raven" to falsify the notion that "laws of physics" are "all there is."  Such an event occurred in Garabandal, Spain, early 1960s, predicted by a little girl, and filmed by atheist sceptics:  a pure white "Host of Light" coalescing in thin air, quite contrary to laws of physics.

The more correct position is open-minded agnosticism, which claims a personal lack of contact with or detection of God.

On the other hand, you would probably find Mark Prophet's "The Path of the Higher Self" and Free and Wilcock's "The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?" http://www.divinecosmos.com worthwhile.

Simpler books include C. S. Lewis' "The Great Divorce," Helen Greaves' "Testimony of Light," O. M. Aivanhov's "Light Is a Living Spirit," Ann Ree Colton's "Men in White Apparel" and "Watch Your Dreams," Jim Tucker, M.D.'s "Life before Life," Lynne McTaggart's "The Field," Yogananda's "Autobiography of a Yogi," Vicki MacKenzie's "Reborn in the West:  The Reincarnation Masters," Rabbi Yonassan Gershom's "Beyond the Ashes:  Cases of Reincarnation from the Holocaust," Martha Beck, Ph.D.'s "Expecting Adam," Dr. Elizabeth Mayer's "Extraordinary Knowing," Dr. William A. Tiller's "Psychoenergetic Science," http://www.tiller.org (this one's not so easy to understand) and David Chamberlain, Ph.D.'s "Babies Remember Birth."

http://www.noetic.org

http://www.integralscience.org

http://noosphere.princeton.edu

http://www.carolbowman.com

http://www.quantumbrain.org

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10

http://www.dreamviews.com

http://www.lucidity.com

http://www.sheldrake.org and

http://www.dreamhealer.com are also good.

Answer 7

I would not accept that we where of coincidence, because we take  a step each day to what we are today , tomorrow and until we come to pass on.

I would say, it is a process, a transitional one, we are just passers-by of this world, meaning that we do not belong here, and that is why we die/pass on.

But at least there should be something that guides us through this transitional process/journey and each of us has a special name for that power. Christians call it God, others in their own way. So i think that it doesn't matter how you call that force, what i believe is that it is one power experienced by all of us differently since we are all different.

Thanks for asking

Answer 8

no i don't think so because the big bang was just a coincidence!

i just think that when the earth was forming, everything came little by little and works together because they were made that way and formed that way. it's not exactly a coincidence!

there is obviously life on other planets because think about it

BILLIONS of galaxies like the milky way with BILLIONS of stars like the sun that could have anywhere from zero to more BILLIONS of planets orbiting them of all shapes and sizes and conditions.

and you have to understand that physical life is not the only existence. there is life on all kinds of frequencies that you may never get to see.

everything is just so big, trying to answer this question for you blows my mind. it would take a very long and detailed conversation to explain my perception to you :)

Answer 9

well the big bang if it was created would only be the creation so that is sort of like saying that the watch is the creator not the watch makeer.

People often say that the universe had to come into existence before a creator.  But if this creator is a 4th demensional creature then he can walk freely through time just as we walk freely through our 3 demensional space so saying that a big band is the beginning to such a creature would be like telling you the beginning of the room is that chair that you can freely walk away from or towards.

I enjoyed the following film on that very subject

Hope this helps

Greg

Answer 10

I personally think there is no such thing as "coincidence" in this subject. Ok, imagine this. Something explodes. It creates planets rotating in perfect axis, earth is the perfect distance away from the sun for life to flourish, everything on earth is created to support life. Is that coincidence? I'm sure God or something had to do with it, it's like you shred a bunch of paper and when you throw into the air and let it fall, it becomes a perfect sheet again. No matter how many times you do it, it just won't. Someone had something to do with it and i'm convinced it's God.