Two friends were recently arguing over what is more beautiful, dusk or dawn. Then I started thinking that aside from the fact that at dawn the sun is rising over time, and thus the darkness is decreasing (and viceversa at dusk), still images of each should not be essentially different, and a viewer could not tell the difference, aside from clues in these images such as clocks or human activity, which is more active at dusk.
So, two images of a country-side landscape, one at dusk and one at dawn should not be any different, or is there some physical difference in the lighting conditions at both times?
Other way of seeing this question is: take a video of dusk filmed by a stationary camera. Take this video and play it backwards. Can I claim is a filming of a dawn? (assuming no birds or other animals are seen flying/walking backwards)
Tags: