Is it safe to say 9/11 happened because of endless US occupation in the Middle East?

Question

Some of you say the government did it, well, you're half right.

Answer 1

ABSOLUTELY

The truth is that the Israeli-Palestinian issue lead to 9/11. It was the core of the hijackers' motivation, as well as all US foreign policy in the middle east such as the occupation of the holiest muslim-only land Saudi Arabia.

Answer 2

yep, BJK just schooled ya on the subject real good~!!!

American Government insiders have been working on occupying a large list of Middle-Eastern Country's for quite a while, way before 911~!!!

then after 911 they used the opportunity to push their agenda to the max~!!!

all the evidence is there and the pieces of the puzzle are all pretty much being put together~!!!

if their was no Internet or people out there that didn't blindly follow along without asking questions and looking for answers, and just went with the flow, we would be ruled under a dictator and a New World Order Fascist Regime right now~!!!

it might be too scary and impossible to believe that our countrys leaders would do something like that, but after WWII

America is where all the crazy rich Ruling Elite Bast*rds immigrated from Europe to to start fresh over here~!!!

and they have been infiltrating our Government ever since~!!!

do some reading up on it, y'all will be amazed~!!!

Answer 3

Probably not safe to say (you'll see soon enough with some of the attacks coming your way); but fairly accurate.

Though it is an oversimplification of the whole situation as well; but no more oversimplified than Bush's "because they hate freedom."  In fact, its quite a bit more logical.

Answer 4

When did we "occupy" the Middle East? Far as I recall we were invited to stay in Kurwait and Saudi Arabia by the legal governments of those Countries. So basically its not "safe to say" or even true. its called a lie, and you are the one saying it.

Answer 5

It is not safe to say that. Ask Ron Paul what that idea did to his presidential aspirations.

Answer 6

I would disagree.  What were we "occupying" before 9/11?

Answer 7

It's safe to say that everyone hates the US until they need us...it's safe to say that even though everyone hates the US, we'll still be there when you need us.

It's also safe to say that the US will fight to keep ours and your right to express yourself - whether it be politically or religiously.

Answer 8

Very safe.

The CIA calls it "blowback".

Answer 9

It is safe to say that is nonsense.

Answer 10

I would bet on it.

Answer 11

9/11 was BEFORE our "constant" occupation in the Middle East.

As far as our "constant occupation" goes-- I'm pretty sure the children who have new schools don't mind. The women who have new hospitals for their babies don't mind. The husbands not being bullied/.threatened/tortured by taliban don't mind.

CNN isn't giving you all of the story. Open your mind. Do you have any idea how many of our servicepeople VOLUNTEER for repeat tours to the Middle East, becasue they know we are making a difference in the lives of the innocents? Talk to someone who has been there. It isn't a d**n video game, it isn't a war movie, it isn't the 6 oclock news. It's real, and our guys don't want to kill-- they want to help, and try not to get killed in the process.  So, in answer to your question: NO. No it is not safe to say that. It's a false statement.

Answer 12

IT IS SAFE TO SAY NO

Answer 13

YES - totally agree!

Answer 14

Much safer to say our own government staged a false flag.

Answer 15

Yes and no.  

Yes.  That would have been part of the motivations behind the Arab terrorists.

No.  The agenda of the other culprits involved (the criminal politicians and government officials that facilitated the attacks and took steps to maximize and exploit) is the exact opposite.  That is, their agenda includes permanent occupation in the Middle East and the installation of pro-US governments.  The proof is in the pudding now, isn't it?  We are in Afghanistan, in Iraq and it looks like Iran is next?

Watch Mike Ruppert's film for a geopolitical angle on 9/11.  The film is a few years old, but still relevant.  It covers potential geopolitical motivations behind 9/11 as well as current and historical criminality in government.

The Truth & Lies Of 9/11

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

or read his book "Crossing the Rubicon".  Great efforts have been made to marginalize and silence Mike Ruppert.  Why has he not been sued for the film and the book?  In his words, "the truth is the perfect defense against libel."

Research the neoconservative think tank "Project for a New American Century" and their ties to and positions in the Bush Administration.  Conveniently, 9/11 was a "windfall" to their geopolitical aspirations for the Middle East .

Learn about what George H.W. Bush meant when he spoke about the New World Order.

Most Americans do not support the war agenda.  

Unfortunately, most Americans have not yet figured out that the main stream media is a propaganda machine for those who profit from war and the overblown war on terror.  The war profiteers who control the media have absolutely no interest in seeing the American people become more educated about Middle Eastern culture.

We are slowly waking up.  Hopefully the majority wake-up while the people still have the civil liberties, privacy and freedom required to stop the insanity.

Answer 16

NO! It happened because we let all the other terrorist attacks go unpunished including the first world trade center bombing. It happened because Islam wants to take over the world. Our culture that allows all kinds of freedoms and is sexually free is considered an abomination to them. They want to dominate and/or eradicated and it has nothing to do with endless occupation in the middle east!