Is it true that one slice of hair that's purposely exposed costs 1000 years in h**l?

Question

there's a hadith saying about this if im not mistaken

Answer 1

Spyware, Mohammad K, all Muslims are supposed to follow Qur'an *and* the Prophet's authentic sunnah. Sunnah commands that we have to cover everything; only the face and hands can be left exposed.

Answer 2

Nobody knows, for sure, until the end of times for sure how much a person gets punished for doing or not doing something. I don't reject hadiths because following the authentic ones is also a part of Islam. But at the same time I get pretty annoyed when people narrate hadiths that are exagerated.  

Answer 3

no that is not true thats crazy i guess almost all of us are going to h**l

Answer 4

Are you serious?? My hair is always exposed.

Answer 5

Bring your evidence

Answer 6

woah.

geez, i need to get started on that hijab  

Answer 7

Uh...no.

Answer 8

whats the saying say...hair has no religious value, except pubic i guess

Answer 9

never heard of it

Answer 10

i am sure about 1000yrs but yes head cover is necessary for women in islam because it is "Satar" means that you need to cover it in any case. beautiful hair is woman's weapon so it's the test that they got to hide it.

Answer 11

i feel sorry for the abominable snowman =(

Answer 12

I hope not.

Answer 13

omg..what?? i hope not!!

answer mine plz.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

Answer 14

these strange rulings are found in hadith conjecture followed by shias and sunnis alike

Answer 15

oh man, are you serious!!!!??? that bites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! cuz i dnt wear hijab, i mean insha'allah i will when i turn like 18, but right now i dnt have the courage........i rlly hope that is not the case, cuz thats horrible.............

EDIT::::::::::::::: and the thumbs down is for what now???

Answer 16

If it's true, I'm in DEEP trouble because I've got a crazy head full of hair and it's never covered!

Answer 17

uhhh what??

Answer 18

the hijab is an icon of Muslim identity (in its Qur'anic use, hijab refers to a wall or curtain but over the centuries, the interpretation became synonymous with head-covering), and while Muslim women have a right to wear it, they and their affiliated organizations should not portray the hijab as a religiously mandated item of clothing, which is also the position of orthodox Jews and Catholic nuns. Besides, the term “religiously mandated” is somewhat of an oxymoron, as the Qur’an clearly states that “there shall be no coercion in religion”.(Q2:256) In some cases, those who choose to wear the hijab make some of their Muslim sisters feel religiously inferior for not abiding by the same dress code. While certain things would certainly seem ordered, every single order has circumstances that might temper it, and anything that is controversial should ipso facto not be seen as "religiously mandated," more so since the hijab certainly does not fit the category of ordered / mandated. When using the Qur'an to make a case for the hijab, Muslims usually cite 24:31 and 33:59, which tells the believing women "to draw their head-coverings over their bosoms and not reveal their charms...(first instance), and then "to draw over themselves some of their outer garments when in public so that they are recognized as decent women and not annoyed..."(second instance). It is paradoxical to presume that prior to these revelations, women were covering their hair because it was an "enticing charm", but leaving their bosoms partially exposed as an act of modesty. This style of dress was obviously in vogue at the time or the instruction to cover the bosom would be pointless. It is preposterous to argue that a woman's exposed head of hair is a more flirtatious act than a partially exposed bosom, and the Qur'anic instructions are clearly about modesty and not covering the hair per se.

Answer 19

LOL

Answer 20

no