that they stay in marriage out of no choice, not coz they're actually happy with what they're doing?
did they view hard times in marriage as challenges to get over, or moments of biting their own tongue carrying all the pains till they die as how many woman todays have been thinking that's what has happened?
were they really oppressed, or protected?
is "marriage & family" must be something that's temporary, before the couple has to split up as to make way for the women, or something that supposedly makes people happy that both husband and wife want to keep it till death?
is family about separation?
Tags: