Is it worth getting a Graphics Tablet?

Question

I'm thinking about getting a Wacom tablet to help me create drawings on my computer.

Obviously drawing on a mouse is almost impossible, but is it better to draw on regular paper & then Scan the artwork in, or do you prefer to create it on a tablet?

Apart from the drawing, do you regularly use a tablet? Is it worth getting one? Any Advice?

Answer 1

If you want to create drawings or colour on the computer, then DEFINITELY yes. It's pretty much a requirement for digital art of any kind. Trying to do it with a mouse is a nightmare! Personally, I both scan pencil drawings and do sketches on the computer with my tablet - neither is really "better", it just depends what kind of line art you are after - but I use the tablet for digitally colouring both.

If you're concerned about the price, it doesn't have to be a Wacom - there are cheaper brands which don't have quite the same quality or longevity, but if you're starting out and just want to try using a tablet they should be fine. You can always upgrade when you need a new one. I have only used Wacom myself, but I have seen other artists recommend Aiptek tablets as a good cheaper alternative ( http://www.aiptek.com ). You can compare some others here: http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/aboutgr...

It's certainly something you should at least try out. Digital art is a lot of fun. :)

Answer 2

Whether I draw on paper, and then scan, or create an image entirely in computer with my tablet depends on the type of image.  I also have a third option, of creating vector illustrations in Adobe Illustrator.

The point is, that I have a choice.  I pick the best tool and application for the job at hand.

I can't tell you that a digital tablet is the right choice for you.  If you are getting the results you want by working on paper and scanning it, then, how can I tell you that you are doing something wrong.  I can only speak for myself when I say that, as a pro, I want ... no, I NEED the options.  For a pro, time really does equal money, and, if I can save a few minutes or more by sketching directly on the monitor, I WILL do it.  But, if I know I will get better results working on paper first, I will do it that way.

For example, if I have a project that should look like a pencil or charcoal sketch, why should I draw it with a digital tablet and THEN use Photoshop filters to make it LOOK like a pencil or charcoal sketch, when I can produce it that way in the first place?  On the other hand, if I have an assignent that requires the crisp, clean, smooth lines of, say, a company logo, why should I bother with straight edges, drawing compas and French curves when Illustrator's paths tool can create the same look, and be infinitely scaleable?

The point is to use the right tool for the job.