Question:

Is rugby the ultimate contest of male dominance..........?

by | earlier

Or is it just a bunch of flat blokes rolling in the mud for an hour and a half as an excuse to get pissed afterwards?

Two minutes before kick off I convince myself its the first one, with 20 minutes to go, when I'm nackered, it begins to feel like the second.

What do you think?

Tags:

Report

Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

Follow Question

20 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date | Rating

rugby league isn't a bunch of fat blokes rolling in the mud. it's a fast paced team sport for outstanding athletes..
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Not really but I suppose you must Try!
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I think most rugby players are closet homo's they all get in the bath together how can this be right?
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I would go for ultimate contest! I don't understand how anyone can prefer American Football, Rugby is a much faster and tougher sport!
Report (0) (0) | earlier
The answer is all of the above! ;) Some players are really serious about the sport and love it, for others it's a social club like a basketball league or softball league (only much more challenging). Either way, there is a great amount of commradery in the sport of rugby. In every sport there are the men who only care about getting pissed after the match and getting into girls' pants. It's not only rugby.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I don't know why but sometimes I found this sport highly turn on-ish!!!
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I think it's a hugly demanding sport and well done to the fit blokes who play it. mmmmmmm lol
Report (0) (0) | earlier
most of it is about getting pissed afterwards and sleeping around
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I don't no what to think
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Well one thing for sure it's not a way of expressing affection to each other
Report (0) (0) | earlier
no. real wrestling, not american professional stuff, but proper olympic wrestling, is the ultimate contest of mae dominance
Report (0) (0) | earlier
No! That definition still applies to war, sadly the ultimate boys game.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
of course its the ultimate contest of male dominance -

you have not armour on like american football. There is no protection from injury other than between your legs. There is no kidney pads and shoulder pads like in american football. American Football is the second Ultimate Contest of Male Dominance but Rugby is the Supreme Contest of it. Lacrosse ?? just a bunch of guys with their sticks like hockey. You have nothing do depend of for protection in Rugby - it tests your threshold level ot pain.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I do think it a good contest of male dominance, but surely in the sporting world, boxing is the only pure contest. Having said that, boxing does often find its way onto the field in rugby (or street-fighting, not really boxing boxing).
Report (0) (0) | earlier
who cares about the dominance thing..you all have great legs
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Yeah, it's just muddy fat blokes!

Never mind, rugby players are the most attractive muddy fat blokes I know, better than pig farmers anyway!
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Rugby is the finest team game in the world and I'd certainly be interested to see how you get on telling the Gloucester front row they're "a bunch of flat blokes rolling in the mud for an hour and a half as an excuse to get pissed afterwards"!
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Lacrosse is way, way tougher.

Don't believe me? watch these!:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjxQq7jjr...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH2ksRnYg...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQjKME-_8...
Report (0) (0) | earlier
no, its the number of girl friends you can juggle at one time....
Report (0) (0) | earlier
you must watch the wrong games it not like the girls who play football and fall over their shoe laces and go off crying
Report (0) (0) | earlier