Is terrorism an anthropological natural hazard? n WHY?

Question

Is terrorism an anthropological natural hazard? n WHY?

Answer 1

No. First of all, terrorism isn't natural. Second, why would terrorism be specifically linked to anthropology? Terrorism can happen to anyone. Being alive is being at risk of terrorism.

Answer 2

Terrorism is of different types and for different reasons. It depends more on the mentality of the being rather than their natural origin. As people of all races, creeds, cultures, etc are awfully mixed up and terrorism is mostly based on religion and such it cannot be a natural hazard to Anthropology.

Answer 3

I can't understand what your point is? Anthropology is the study of humans, terrorist are people who use terror in pursuit of political aims.

But if you are referring to terrorists opinion on anthropology, I would compare them maybe to the Church and Science since 15th century, or maybe vice versa. It depends on whose viewpoint one is looking from (robin hood would be a 'terrorist' today).

Answer 4

The reason for terrorism can be derived from multiple areas and is a human concept so it isn't natural. Now, we can use anthropology, along with other social science, to determine the reasoning behind terrorism and the mind of the terrorist but that doesn't mean it's connected to those concept.