Regardless of whether you were for or against the invasion and occupation of Iraq, consider its implications. I've tried to provide an explanation of the death toll counts below. Don't forget about over 4,000 US troops who died, over a hundred thousand wounded, etc. And regardless if the civilian death toll count is over a million or not, consider the consequences of such renowned polls and journals spreading such information to the world. What will be said of America in the short-term and long-term?
We already know Bush's claims about Iraq's WMD's and links to Al Qaeda were proved false (no WMD's were found and the 9/11 commission found no link's between Iraq's regime and al qaeda. So, now what do we do with mounting casualties since the US invasion?
The Lancet, "one of the most well-known peer-reviewed medical journals in the world" (wikipedia, the lancet), estimated in 2006 that over 600,000 Iraqi deaths were due to violence after the 2003 US invasion. See the following link for a mention of the lancet report: (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/53905.php)
The following website uses Lancet's report and other data to arrive at a current toll well over a million: http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
Another count, by prestigiousus British polling agency, Opinion Research Business (ORB), estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US invasion, which credits Just foreign Policy's site somewhat. Are we (or should I say corporation and state) trying to match Hitler's destruction of human life, or at least doing this without acknowledging it?
Tags: