Is the Us Weekly magazine Palin article responsible journalism?

Question

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjQhiarIQaw

Answer 1

No-there is a reason it is sold in grocery check-out lines next to Weekly World News and its stories of Bat-Boy.

Answer 2

Of course not.

Its more liberal bias.

The editor is a major contributor to libs. Its not rocket science to see the a$$$ kissing edition he did on Hussein Obammy, and compare it with the evil hit job he did on Sarah Palin.

Answer 3

attack smack  Obama has talked his way out of my vote everytime he thinks of something original to say...."it's hard enough for hunters to find places to hunt MT."  Yeah, since he knows what in the h**l he's talking about, plenty of out-of-staters don't have any trouble finding access to lands and if he's that stupid about recreational sports, i CAN'T WAIT TO SEE HOW MUCH DUMBER HE IS IN AN IMPORTANT POLITICAL SOCIAL DEBATE.  McCain is an old hat.  WHEW go GRANDPA!!! and bring along little sisssy to KICK SOME ***.  s***w THE DEMOCRATIC "I'm a weenie and I don't want to say anything with clarity so I just speak WISHY WASHY WISH my way into WASHINGTON's WHITE HOUSE, in DC) yes people I know my geography...UNLIKE SOME democratic incredibly TAN American/ part Canadian...WHO IN the HECK is he trying to get votes from abroad?  ALL The traveling american's who could give a rat's *** about US politics because they've all applied for alien citizenship?  or is he singing to the locals of the foriegn countries: I WHISY WASHY I WAS IN WASHINGTON!  Go Momma! HEY if she can raise intelligent kids PRAISE GOD!  (oh I forgot they took that off the dollar).  THANK GOD she didn't just marry the guy and she has the balls NOT to freak out for social faux's press attacks and didn't get an abortion, HEY I'm pregnant and I"M making the best choice for ME and MY BABY and I'm going to marry this guy WHEN I am sure he's right for ME, can't change the fact that he's the baby's father, but i can decide if he's going to be my spouse.  WHEW what a POSITIVE ROLL MODEL!  Seriously!  THINKING she is smart.  AND SO HER MOther must me TOO,  Yeah, Obama stands for what now? Getting to smile and wave from the oval office?  (does it have windows).  WHo gives a ****.  This woman's going to be speaking from them NOT JUST TOSSING OUt TOOTSIE ROLLS, WHAT DOES OBAMA THINK THIS IS A FRICKIN PARADE!  GROW SOME NUT BEARING TREES THERE DEMOCRATS!!!!  AND THEN GIVE THE REST OF THE WORLD THE MESSAGE YOU GAVE THEM LAST TIME, LET ME BEND OVER BEFORE YOU MAKE THAT NEXT ATTACK.  OH, AND I'M SORRY WE ARE AMERICAN.  I hope to GOD McCain and the REAL WOMAN in politics N EVER appologizes for being AMERICAN!!!!  YEP, Hillary you would have had my vote, but social marriage is so messed up. you could have at least beat clintons *** with a spatula for publically making a monkey show of your marriage.  NOPE DEMOCRATS ARE IN IT FOR THE POLITICS AND PARTY FAVORS, NOT THE KICK *** UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  

Answer 4

Dude, that is a gossip rag up there with "people" magazine and "OK!" magazine.

You may as well get your news from "tiger beat"  They ran multiple stories on Brittney Spears.  If you're "trusted news source" delves into Brittney Spears more than once a millenium, then they aren't reputable.  Its more like 'info-tainment'

You do realize that when people such as "megyn kelly" give these rags airtime, they sell more copies right?  And then you come on here, link to the youtube, people see it and then they go buy it.

So really you're propagating this trash.  The best thing to do with trash is throw it out.

Obama in 2008

whoa! a thumb down?!?!?  I suppose US Weekly is a great news source...  for trash.

Oh, and by fair reporting do you mean "TERRORIST FIST JAB"  Seriously, you're whining about nothing and its hilarious.

Answer 5

It's a rag ran by Obamamites...

Answer 6

No...the opposite actually.

Answer 7

The biased FoxNews reporter certainly seemed to have both anger issues and an agenda, too.

Answer 8

Megan Kelly from Fox news nailed Us Weekly on the facts that they had showed nothing to back their claims up. The editor had no answers except that the story was fast breaking and they didn't have time to get their facts in line ( could it be because the is no truth behind their claims) you can't back a lie up report both sides of the story or don't call your self a journalist

Answer 9

You know, if you're looking to Us Weekly as your source for responsible political journalism, you're looking in the wrong place.