Is the hand more important than the eye?

Question

Agree or Disagree? Why?

Answer 1

Disagree. All parts are important and work well together.

Answer 2

Personally I'd say hand just because of the fact that everything would so nearly impossible without hands whereas without eyes you adapt by using your other senses. I just can't see myself trying to feed myself using my feet.

Excuse the pun.

Answer 3

If I had to choose between losing my eyes or losing my hands, I would choose to lose my eyes.  So from that perspective, I think the hand is more important to me.

It would be difficult to cope with the loss of you eyes, but without hands... you couldn't even feed yourself, shy of learning to eat with your feet.  Blind people can at least open doors and feed themselves.  Some can even still cook!

Answer 4

Based on the fact I don't know what subject matter it is pointing to, the equanamity of each part as being balanced equal or inequal and it's weight of importance changes accordingly

Visual Quality inspector:  The eye

Tactile Quality Inspector: The hand

Washing dishes: The hand. Finger tips are more sensitive to uneven surfaces. Meaning they can detect debris left behind not quite cleaned off vs. the eye. Why blind people are good at Braille

Throwing Darts or any sport: Usually equal (self explanatory)

Child Rearing: The hand. Human contact is a key quality in healthy child growing.  Also for most relationships

Initial Sexual Attraction: The eye.  It is one of the integral parts to triggering the pheromones.

Sexual relations: The hand. Again human contact is very important

Driving a vehicle:  for gosh sakes!  BOTH

Hopefully that helped

Answer 5

I always heard that the hand was quicker than the eye.

Answer 6

ha ha ha ha is this a leading question Jb? lol

I know guys that can spot an easy lay from 300m so they've got hidden talents as well as a quick eye but the hand can bring so much pleasure from being so so so slow.

I think the hand is quicker than the eye though, physiologically speaking.