Is the human race a type of virus that needs a cure?

Question

I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here on earth.

It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I've realised that you are not actually mammals.

Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural

equilibrium with the surrounding environment. But you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area.

There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is?

A virus.

Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. A plague in need of a cure.

With thanks to the Matrix script. Do you agree????

Answer 1

No, because that is to suggest that everyone is the same.

Answer 2

i personally believe that the human race will undoubtebly kill istelf off.

Answer 3

yeah to all

Answer 4

There are two distinct human races distinguishable only by their BEHAVIOR:

1- technology advanced human race= these are the Athlantian, their ideology is to replicated what nature is doing in order to control and extend their colonies around the universe (just like a virus always in search of health body  or land or planet ....)..it is believed that this race is in contact with extra terrestrial entities and receives information through channeling....

2- Holistically advanced human race = these are the Lemurian, they are the origin (indigenous) of this planet and have the secret of nature (expert in shamanic, herbal and astrology) and are still living in harmony with nature ecosystem (this race is referred by the Athlantian as poor uneducated, savage humans and are a threat for the Athlantian system).

A long time ago there was a terrible war between these two school of thoughts. And as you can imagine the Lemurian lost the battle and had to give their planet Earth to be governed and ruled by the Athlantian human race. The Athlantian race introduced their political ideology which is to advance in technology at the cost of exploiting Earth's resources even if this harms the planet, to then expand their colonies throughout the universe. (the life style you see today). First they introduced the banking& insurance system (conquered lands and enslaved the indigenous) then they started educating science and technology; rationality is the key of their success as they lack emotion and feelings nor can they understand that "intuition" or "wisdom" which is present in many Lemurian origin blood line.

Now here we are all questioning whether we are a "Virus" or something else...as you can imagine we all have been educated from child wood the Athlantian education mentality.   which now we found out to be totally out of synchronicity with Nature.

The solution to this problem is that first the existence/origin of the ET( alien/Extra-terrestrial) must be revealed official to all humans, then the "virus behavior" has to be neutralised and re-educated in respect of earth's ancestor memories.

Yes, I agree with you it is time to cure the cancer

Answer 5

In the end, will nature or humankind "win?"

Answer 6

We actually were held in equilibrium until we started developing medicine. We are not free of the limitations of our environment though and we will soon kill the host so to speak. So yes in a sense we are a virus...

Answer 7

no,

I could say something like perhaps you should eliminate you r part of the virus is you feel that way, but I won't

Answer 8

Its funny how in the movie the machines thought of us like that, yet they solely depended on us as an energy source. Maybe we humans would be put to better use as mere batteries?

Answer 9

yes i do agree

Answer 10

I have never heard of it this way, but yes. We are doing things to this planet that no other mammal population would do, and we are ruining it and making it "sick". We need a cure, though I don't know what....

Hope this helps...

Answer 11

well first lets define what a virus does

it invades its host and replicates itself causes the host to kill itself and produce more of the virus.

can humans do the same thing to other living creatures? not really

can humans "infect" the environment through urbanization? most certainly

I suppose that humans can be considered a virus of the earth but also every other living creature is also a virus. which means humans are the most "superior" virus.

/rant

Answer 12

All humans are not like viruses, it is just you.

Answer 13

Has anyone looked at the state of the human race lately?

I mean… I'm not racist. I'm not a n**i. I don't think the Third World should be killed off because they are poor or uneducated, so please, read on…

I'm a biology major. I'm pretty proud of it too. While my business major roommates were drinking and watching TV, I was studying… That doesn't make me better than them… Just differently educated.

Recently, I've been asking myself the question, "Is anyone taking notice of where the human race is?"

Yes, we have created Microsoft and other major monopolies, but what about us, as DNA? (Let's skip the stuff about aliens and if they are here for now, it's really a different topic.)

I'm actually concerned with evolution…

One thing that I have learned during my biology courses is that evolution is an on going process. It's always there… If organisms don't appear to be changing, then their gene pool is probably getting smaller and in effect, as a whole, the species is changing, and evolving.

But what about humans, with all of our technology?

The United States Center for Disease Control recently release a report that said half of all the bacteria that make people sick are resistant to antibiotics.

So I ask you, the people of the technology age, is our technology good? Or, are we actually harming ourselves by using technology without foresight? We can get into an endless argument on cloning or reproductive rights, so lets drop those ideas for this discussion. What I want to talk about are antibiotics, genetic diseases, vaccines and glasses. Yes, glasses. First I would like to say that both my dad and my roommate have the thickest glasses beer bottles can make. They are essentially blind with out their fake eyes. I do not wish them dead or sterile, or I would not be here right now. I also know I will need glasses by the time I am 40 so I don't want to start death camps. But we need to remember that evolution does happen. And it happens every generation.

In the wild, an animal that has poor eyesight is at a disadvantage in its environment. There is an increasingly large disadvantage for an animal to live and reproduce as its eye sight is worse. Therefore, through the process of natural selection bad eyesight in a species is eliminated. It's not very often that a cat is born that needs glasses, or an eagle, or a squirrel. It happens, but very rarely, and usually they aren't able to reproduce so the trait is not passed on. It has been shown that since the creation of eyeglasses, the need for eyeglasses has actually increased. We are becoming a species more and more reliant on the technology we create. Small pox has been completely eliminated in human populations through the use of vaccines. There are currently two known places in the world that contain the virus that causes small pox, the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, and Russia's State Center for Virology and Biotechnology in Koltsovo, Siberia. The last reported case of small pox occurred in Africa during the 1970's. Since the early '80's no one in the world has been advised to get vaccinated against the small pox virus. This means that anyone in control of the virus has the most potent biological weapon available today. Why? Because they can vaccinate who ever they want (their soldiers) but even the current US stockpile of small pox vaccine (the largest in the world) would only protect 3 to 5 million people. I don't believe that this is a good situation, but it's not exactly what I want to talk about.

So let's focus on a different vaccine… how about measles? The truth of the matter is that the measles vaccine hasn't always been working lately. People that in the past have been thought to be safe from the disease because of vaccination have recently gotten sick from the virus, and some of them have died. What if no one was vaccinated for measles these days? Would the virus run rampant over the world like it did in the past? The answer is yes, it would. But what happens when the vaccine is ineffective against the virus? Will the disease proliferate then?

The problem with vaccines (including the measles vaccine) is that they promote evolution. Simply put, they do not allow all the targeted viruses to reproduce. In the case of small pox, it appears to stop all of the virus in the world from reproducing in humans. In the case of measles, the vaccine stopped some, but not all of the virus from reproducing. Now we are dealing with the vaccine resistant strains of measles that are still surviving. Therefore, we need a new vaccine.

How about AIDS? An AIDS vaccine appears to be in the works, and looks very promising. But HIV is a stubborn virus, and although there is hope that an AIDS vaccine may work, the vaccine will not kill the HIV virus. It will simply stop HIV from becoming AIDS in patients. This means that people that are vaccinated can have HIV, will never get AIDS, but still have a very small chance of passing on the HIV virus to future people.

So I ask you, are we going to live with the HIV virus? Is everyone going to be vaccinated and possibly infected with HIV at the same time? And if so who is going to pay for the world's vaccination? What happens if a strain of the virus is unaffected by the vaccine? (We would need a new vaccine)

I would like to mention now that I am not a pessimist, actually my friends view me as an optimist. Personally I like to think of myself as a realist.

Recently we have made huge strides in genetic disease technology. Diabetes can be controlled with insulin, cleft lips can be fixed with surgery, seizures can be stopped with medication, the list goes on and on. But what are we doing to our gene pool by passing on these diseases to future populations?

Once again, I would like to say that I am not a n**i, I do not believe in the Aryan race, and I certainly do not want to eliminate people because of their disabilities. Before World War IIand the Holocaust, state and county fairs would actually judge and give out ribbons to who they thought were the best families. Yes, people would apply in a competition to see essentially who carried the best genetic material and there would be a blue ribbon winning family. Can anyone see why this was stopped during the Holocaust? I don't believe in this kind of competition, the truth is I have scoliosis (a crooked spinal column). Most likely I inherited this from my mother, who is also afflicted with this disease, and there is a high probability that I will pass it on to my children.

By passing this disease on to the next generation I will be, in a sense, harming our species' gene pool.

The problem is the human race is relying more and more on technology to survive, and without it many in our population would simply not be able to survive. So instead of evolving to make the species stronger, we evolve to make the species weaker, and more reliant on technology.

Technologies such as antibiotics, which have undoubtedly helped people survive in the past, are allowing the majority of our species to survive with a weakness towards bacterial infections. Instead of evolving through natural selection (yes, that means people dying) so that bacteria do not cause disease in humans we are evolving into a dependence on technology. We take drugs to treat bacterial infections that other species evolve to cope with, we have surgery to treat genetic diseases such as spina bifida (a deformed spinal cord at birth) and we pass on these diseases on to future generations. This dependence on technology leaves one looming question in our near future.

What happens when our technology fails?

What happens when antibiotics don't work? What happens when we can't treat the diseases in our society through surgery? The fact is that evolution is at work. By passing these "treatable" diseases on to future generations we are creating more of these diseases in future generations. The truth is that with each future generation we will have to have more and more health care workers to treat the growing number of people that have diseases. It is obvious that our entire workforce can not be entirely centered on health care or our society can't survive. Who would produce the food? So what are we going to do in the future?

I understand that this is all a little far fetched. You have to understand that I am looking towards the future, we aren't all going to be health care workers 10 years from now. However, I am not looking deep into the future. Antibiotic resistance is a real life problem today. It is one of the first signs that our technology reliant health may be failing and I'm afraid it is only the tip of the iceberg.

How many generations do I think we have before we really have problems providing health care to our species because of this reliance on technology and our inferior gene pool? Well, it's very difficult to say… but my guess is three generations. Three generations from now today's antibiotics will be completely ineffective and if the current lack of new antibiotic development is continued we will have no means to combat simple bacterial infections. By then the genetic diseases, that we so easily pass on today to the next generation, will be more difficult to fix due to the sheer population numbers of people effected with the diseases. So where do we look for answers? Genetic engineering could solve many of the problems we are facing today. It could be used as a tool to evolve ourselves toward a more fit, less healthcare dependent race. But the technology to do this is not available today, and probably not in the near future, not to mention the highly controversial "God like" role it would have to play.

So I want to you to look a little more carefully at the news from now on. When you  

Answer 14

you have got point

Answer 15

Are you ok? haha

That is not true.  Humans can be horribly distructive, but we can also help the enviroment.  Some people grow their own crops and they dont move around to other areas.

Answer 16

You have been watching too much of Matrix.

Answer 17

I've given a lot of thoght to that statemen, ever since i first saw the movie. Simply because we have a choice as to weather or not we destroy this planet of ours, No. A true virus, like HIV, has no choice. It has to behave in that way or it will die, but it can't contemplate the choice or the dieing.

Answer 18

To and extent, we can destroy but we also rebuild.

Answer 19

You are not correct, I can tell you never had.....kittens!