Is the liberal lip service to women's rights just talk?

Question

They glory in the fact that a competent woman wasn't given a spot on their party ticket and now they are complaining about a woman being on the Republican ticket. Quit the hate!

Answer 1

we have done more for women rights in the past 2 months,then you guys have for the past 200 years.this women is anti-feminism,have you seen her record for god sake?

Answer 2

Libs are all talk, double standard experts, and twisters of the truth, especially when it comes to women and race !

Answer 3

I have no problem with woman. Completely incompetent woman in potential governing positions are another matter.

Answer 4

i as a women do not have a problem that she is on the Republican ticket, because McCain made it easier for Obama to win. McCain only pick her because she was a women and that is pandering to women and ignoring the issues. Which he has done threw out the his whole campaign.

Answer 5

If it looks like a t**d, smells like a t**d...it must be a t**d....

Answer 6

Oy! I know what you mean, bruddah.

Liberals helped women earn the right to vote and break the glass ceiling and gain control over their own bodies.

Seems like there's no pleasin' em. I tell ya, I'm glad to be a diehard republican. We know how to keep our wimmin in the kitchen and in token jobs. And if this McCain feller weren't so d**n lame in the brain, he coulda picked a stronger VP.  

Answer 7

Whatever , The republicans screwed up, I would like to see her go to War , You guys have screwed up this country, Now once agin its time for the Democrats to clean your d**n mess up.........

Answer 8

s***w women's rights. They shouldn't have anymore than anyone else.

You only have the rights you chose to use.

Palin used her rights, just a guy, and look whatshe has acheived.

The only pediment to her being accepted by other women is that she makes them look like slakers.

Easier to stay a victem

Answer 9

She's not even the most qualified GOP female out there!!

Answer 10

maybe hillary will be getting a new hairstyle in the near future.

Answer 11

she is pro-life, she hunts, she is a member of the NRA, she has 5 kids, she is a "good christian woman" all things the republicans are using to get the "average" (especially rural) women to vote for them.

yet they don't want these same women to get healthcare or our public schools to get decent teachers and decent funding!

it's her image, she is a pawn!

i see right through it (and i am one of those women they are trying to get!!)

Answer 12

Most Libs DONT LIKE WHEN WOMEN R USED BY MEN.Plain dont mind she is a republican

Answer 13

It certainly seems so. I mean how could you not select the woman who received more votes than any other candidate in the history of of our great nation? Obama's a sham.

Answer 14

No, you're illogical.

Was it a deep hatred that McCain had for Romney that made it so he didn't choose him?  Or would it be sexist if he didn't choose Palin?  In fact, maybe it would be racist and sexist not to go with Condaleeza Rice!

Answer 15

She's against women's rights. That's why people are complaining.  Get a clue!

Answer 16

yes.

Answer 17

McCain picked a woman for no other reason then to be a token he can hopefully use to gain votes. I think it's a joke and would almost be laughable but alas it's just an insult to women.Just to make things clear I do not support McCain or Obama .