Is the media cherry-picking scientific research it reports in ordr to control opinion regarding AGW?

Question

I've seen no mainstream media coverage of this......

http://climatesci.colorado.edu/publications/pdf/R-321.pdf

Journal of Geophysical Research:

"Unresolved issues with the assessment of multidecadal global land surface temperature trends"

Roger A. Pielke Sr.,1 Christopher A. Davey,2 Dev Niyogi,3,4 Souleymane Fall,4

Jesse Steinweg-Woods,3,4 Ken Hubbard,5 Xiaomao Lin,5 Ming Cai,6 Young-Kwon Lim,7

Hong Li,8 John Nielsen-Gammon,9 Kevin Gallo,10 Robert Hale,11 Rezaul Mahmood,12

Stuart Foster,12 Richard T. McNider,13 and Peter Blanken14

Received 7 November 2006; revised 5 February 2007; accepted 14 May 2007; published 29 December 2007.

Answer 1

Absolutely

Answer 2

With out a doubt!  Any positive results of AGW are ignored by the media. they show the Arctic ice melting or drought, but never followed up with the fact that the ice returned and surpassed the area and mass it had before the melt or the end of droughts and bumper crops in other areas. They harp on the possible extinction of polar bears but never mention that their populations have not been affected by the melting ice. All you see is negative images with out any lip service to possible positive effects. if warming occurs it will not mean the end of the human race, we will just have to move around a bit like people did in the past.

Answer 3

CLICK ON THIS   http://www.socyberty.com/Activism/First-... THE SCIENTIST ARE PRESSURED INTO JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, LIKE THE E.P.A. DID. I SENT THE EPA A EXPERIMENT TO GIVE THEIR CONCLUSION TO CONGRESS. IT WILL SHOW THAT GASES, EXHAUST AND CARBONS DONT REACH 500 FEET LET ALONE HIGHER. The cause for G.W. is caused by a much higher intelligence than man, we dont have this technology, but we do have the answer.