Is the same to be a totonaca indian princess, than a england princess???

Question

cause im think than is the same !!

Answer 1

Try re-posting in readable English.

To answer what I think you are asking, a member of a Royal Family is just that.

It is the one title that puts every country (providing it has a Royal Family) on a level with each other.

The King of an African tribe is socially the same as the Queen of England.

Answer 2

Had to quick look it up that Totonaca is an American Indian tribe.

That said from research I have done into my Husband's ancestry (Great-Grandma was a Cherokee Princess) the answer is NO an Indian princess is not the same as being an England princess.

In the Indian culture all the daughters of all the chiefs are called Princess.

But than again in all most cultures the daughter's of the ruling class are called Princess. So in some respects they would be the same.

Answer 3

Are you sure that the Totonaca had such a rank?

Answer 4

A princess is a princess, whatever country they are from.  When Prince Charles and Princess Diana went to Japan for I believe what was the enthronement of the new Emporer, even though they were considered the world's number one prince and princess, they were actually WAY down on the list of the titled people who also were there, something like 70th.

Answer 5

I don't believe that European royals consider Indian royals to be equals. The British royal house belongs in the top tier of royalty and are widely considered to be one of the grandest houses in the world. I am not sure where the various Indian royals belong.

Answer 6

Makes you wonder why the USA  wanted Geronimo and his people  extinguished.