Is there 2 many humans on this Earth to support?

Question

I mean the 3rd world has too many people on it as it is. But the developed world allows 2 many sickly,disabled,shiftless bums,illegals to exist. But our planet also has finite resources as well. Ever think about the 'tragedy of the commons' fable,where everyone uses the same space as if it was limitless,but due to overgrazing and no constraints on usage,we may now be witnessing the beginning of the end of modern civilization as we know it,no small thanks 2 Jorge Bush-tard and his Texan cronies at Haliburton whose greed and selfishness has caused the very problems we have today.

Answer 1

In my deepest personal opinion, we as human beings can support the world but to a limit. Yes, there are to many people in the world to support. Africa's population alone has almost skyrocketed to 930 million compared to over 300 million Americans. I am 17 years old, younger than most who has experienced more and have stronger opinions on these types of ordeals, but i believe that there should be a limit to the reproduction rate across the nation and across the world. The Earth does have enough recourse's to help us humans to survive but these "natural resources" won't last forever. We have already corrupted the world now as it is by using our resources like there free kittens (because cats pop them out at least twice a year, never ending). Like I said, they wont last forever; plus we take the world for advantage of the whole concept of "Global Warming". Anyway, my point being is that Yes, there are to many humans on Earth to support.

My other opinion is that we should help our planet instead of the planet helping us. *Recycle, Solar Power, Energy Efficient Cars, etc.*

Answer 2

I agree that overpopulation may eventually become a problem in the world... But your view of humanity sucks.  Just because a person is sickly or disabled, doesn't mean they don't have the right to live and experience life, the same way others do.

Answer 3

I'm beginning to wonder!

Answer 4

the world is far from being over populated, to be sure there are areas that are over populated, but as a whole we aren't even close.

how is it Halliburton, and Bush responsible for the problems of the World today? these problems have be going on since before you, I or Bush was born.

Answer 5

Yes,

Crises brings solution as well.

thnks

Answer 6

you globalist need to quit buying into lies. they say we need to decrease the population so they can use that as a reasonible exscuse to kill us all. just watch the documentary endgame.

Answer 7

If everyone on earth lived with the consumption rate of Americans, we'd need 6 earths.  So yes, too many to support like Americans live.  Clearly the earth supports the people it has now.  Whether we're living in a sustainable manner is a good question.

As to whether we are at the end of civilization as we know it - of course!  We always are.  The Greeks lived in city states.  The Romans established an empire running on slaves.  The US ran on wood.  Then on coal.  Then on oil.  Then on . . . .  That's where we are.  Horses, foot, and sail.  Then add towboats pulled by stock and boats fueled by wood.  Then trains fueled by wood and then coal.  Then automobiles . . .  

We're always destroying the past and inventing the future.  

We'll quite possibly run into famine soon in marginal countries.  Population cutbacks from avian flu.  Who knows what.  Things change.

Answer 8

yes some people don't care

Answer 9

depends on how you want to define living, or support.  If you dont mind sacrificing quality for quantity, then we are heading in the right direction.

Answer 10

No I don't think so. I think that those who keep raising this issue are those not experiencing massive famine or health problems.  I do think wealth is and has always been unevenly distributed since the colonization uprising (500+ yrs ago in U.S.) and is a cause for many national and even global problems.  More money for developing nations will decrease their need exploitive consumerism values that have been pressed on them.  Social justice is more important than worrying about how many people are on this earth.