Is there a "Bigfoot"?

Question

I was reading where the was some talk of a giant ape related to a prehistoric creature. What are the latest findings

Answer 1

Without a doubt. The family wilderness compound is about 20 miles from where this picture was taken if you'd have seen the tracks we've seen and the damage done to the deer feeders, you'd have second thoughts about not carrying a sidearm in the forest.

Answer 2

Very likely, no proof yet. Too many reports to ignore. Breakthrough this decade, I hope!

Answer 3

Maybe,but it gets more doubtful every day.As every new hoax is exposed and no evidence comes along.It gets more and more difficult to believe.

Answer 4

No, but his relatives Sasquatch and Yeti and still on the loose......

Answer 5

Yeah they found my sister!!! lol

Answer 6

I don't believe in bigfoot

Answer 7

Nah don't know. But I tell you what if Big foot(possible missing link) was found then that will finally completely verify that Man evolved from apes and also convince me.

Answer 8

No physical evidence for the creature commonly referred to as Bigfoot.  There are some castings taken which, despite the presence of dermal ridges, were admitted to be a hoax.  There are a handful of videos and films which have been shown to be hoaxes.  Here's a good rundown of the evidence of Bigfoot:

http://www.csicop.org/si/2002-03/bigfoot...

Although it's possible, it's *highly* unlikely there is a population (not just an individual) of primates the size of Bigfoot that have not left any evidence of their existence.  They would be close in size to gorillas and would have to number in the hundreds in order to maintain a population large enough to survive.  So where are they?

P.S. The Jacobs photos show a skinny, mangy bear, not a primate.  This is pretty clear given the presence of other bears.

Answer 9

yea there are two..

Serena and Venus Williams

http://updatecenter.britannica.com/eb/im...

(its a joke people)