Here's the thing. My girlfriend migrated to Canada as a Permanent Resident. Around year after she visited me and we got married, and I then applied for permanent residency to Canada under spousal class. We then received a notification from the visa office that they cannot approve of my application since I was not declared as a common-law spouse when my then girlfriend (now wife) applied for her permanent residency according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulation 117(9)(d).
Unfortunately, in a letter to prove our ongoing relationship, we had explicitly mentioned that we DID live together for around 2 years before she migrated. However, to prove a common-law relationship, there must be some sort of conjugal asset/property like joint accounts, declaration as beneficiary or what-have-you, which we did NOT have.
So, is this possible to be presented as non-proof of a common-law relationship and thus could NOT be declared as such therefore the above 117(9)(d) cannot take effect?
I read that section well enough but I hope someone with legal expertise could give an opinion. Thank you all in advance
Tags: