Question:

Is there any truth about gas prices in this letter to the editor?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

It's up to us to cut gas prices Print E-mail

Dave Op't Hof

http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/259261/58/

The price of gasoline has hit a new high, as I'm sure you are well aware. We all lament the high cost of fuel and the repercussions it has in our economy. High fuel prices drive up the cost of everything from groceries to cars, because everything we buy is shipped in vehicles that burn some form of oil, be it gasoline or diesel. As our economy slides towards recession, the last thing we need is for prices to go up. This will result in what economists call "stagflation", a situation in which prices are going up while jobs and wages are being lost.

The rising cost of fuel is primarily a matter of supply and demand. With the economies of Asia growing rapidly, notably China and India--between them containing one third of the world's people-- demand for oil is outstripping the supply, driving up the price of oil. This will get worse, not better, as the countries of Asia add more cars.

Let's not forget the impact of the OPEC nations, who together exert considerable control over oil prices. Venezuela, Iran, and Libya are members of OPEC and they prosper as oil prices rise, as do other non-OPEC nations who produce lots of oil. Plus they enjoy the side benefit of watching our economy falter. Do you remember the vow made by Osama Bin Laden the day before the last presidential election, November 1, 2004. He promised to continue a "policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy". Increasing oil prices play right into the hands of terrorists like Bin Laden who want to destroy us any way they can, and who also benefit from the oil revenues of terrorist-sponsoring nations like Iran.

Consider, too, the oil companies who are complicit with the terrorists in squeezing our economy. The oil companies have all posted RECORD profits as oil prices have reached $3+ per gallon. I have no problem with them making a profit--every business needs to make a profit. But RECORD profits, while the country is slipping into recession? It's immoral and downright unpatriotic for the oil companies to be raking in the dough while the rest of us are tightening our belts to brace for a downturn.

We are not powerless in this situation, however. Just as OPEC has control over supply, we have control over demand. The growth of China and India notwithstanding, the United States is still the largest consumer of fossil fuels, using 20.7 million barrels of oil per day. This exceeds the amount, 19.8 million bbl/day, used by the next 5 highest nations combined (in order, China, Japan, Germany, Russia, and India). ( http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_con-energy-oil-consumption ) To the degree we cut our consumption of fuel, we can fight back. Indeed, we MUST fight back.

Some would lay sole responsibility for doing something about high energy prices at the feet of our government. Government can and certainly should do something about it, but we cannot afford to wait for federal action in this matter. It takes an act of Congress to change national energy policy and we all know how slow that is. It is up to us, individually and collectively to take action; Congress might then follow our lead.

I'm not talking about a one-day boycott--that's like trying to lose a hundred pounds by not eating for one day, and the oil companies sneer at such efforts. I'm talking about things that will cut consumption permanently. If each of us drives less by carpooling, using mass transit, riding bikes, walking, consolidating trips to the store--anything we can think of, can we cut our individual consumption by 10%, maybe 20%? In our homes, can we set our thermostats a few degrees lower in the winter and a few higher in the summer? As we replace light bulbs, can we switch to the compact fluorescents? Can we seal up those leaks around windows and doors? Energy conservation is no longer a matter of saving the earth, which is important, or even saving money on fuel. It is a matter of national security, because right now we are at the mercy of OPEC; they have our heads in a vise and are tightening it every time the price of oil goes up.

As a nation, we need leadership that will encourage radically new energy policy, not policy dictated by the fat wallets of the oil companies. Ethanol is a fabulous alternative because, not only does it get us off foreign oil, but it gives American farmers a cash crop that will make them absolutely prosper. No longer will we have to prop up American agriculture with the ridiculous policy of paying farmers NOT to grow. Plus, ethanol is renewable; we can grow a new crop when the old one has been harvested.

And consider this, when the world's oil reserves are gone, as they will be someday, what will the Arabs have to manipulate us with then? If we have engaged our agricultural powerhouse into growing crops for ethanol, we could become a major exporter of ethanol fuels, and we could find ourselves in control of the world's economy, instead of at its mercy. We could have the Arabs begging for our fuel and paying top dollar for it.

Efforts need to be stepped up to make hybrid and hydrogen cars more affordable. If American auto-makers were more pro-active in developing alternative automobiles, they wouldn't be floundering against the Japanese. We need government policies that encourage the Yankee ingenuity that gave us the automobile, the airplane, the computer and the Internet so that entrepreneurs of vision will take the risks needed to make these new automotive technologies economically viable.

Alternative energies like solar, wind, nuclear, geothermal and hydroelectric also need to be promoted vigorously and we must raise our voices to demand leadership from our elected officials to make it happen. The project to put a wind farm in Spanish Fork canyon is visionary and highly commendable. We need more of such projects because, once again, they are renewable.

Consider this a call to arms: we CAN fight back against high oil prices. Indeed, each one of us MUST, starting today. Not only is it good for each of us as consumers, it is strategically vital for us as a country, and of course, for our mother earth. If we put our backs and our minds to it, we could impact demand for oil within a month and be energy independent within five years. Then we'll have OPEC begging us to buy their stinking oil, for 25 cents a gallon or less.

Dave Op't Hof is a Provo resident.

--

 Tags:

   Report

9 ANSWERS


  1. The letter is correct about some things and wrong about others.

    — Correct about supply and demand.

    — Correct about where the new demand is coming from.

    — Correct about who benefits from high oil prices, but the implication of purposeful action isn't supported by evidence; geological factors are sufficient to explain tight supplies.

    — Wrong about the oil-company conspiracy.  The multinational oil companies don't control enough of the world's oil to set prices.

    — Correct about US oil consumption (though it omits US oil production, which is still 5+ million barrels/day).

    — Correct about the only usable response:  USE LESS.

    — Completely wrong about being able to use corn to get off oil.  Corn ethanol's fuel return on energy invested is about 1.06:1; it is a farm price-support program, not an energy program.

    — Correct about alternative energy sources.


  2. Land is being deforested to grow ethanol

    Car fuel efficiency needs to be increased. period!

    Developing cities that allow people the option of walking, or bicycling.

    Creating a public transit system that is efficient and timely.

    Utilizing solar power to reduce the exclusive need for fossil fuel, natural gas, and coal

  3. The ethanol statement is a crock.  

    Corn-based ethanol uses up tons of water and takes much more energy itself to make.  It also takes pretty much all the corn away from the food industry so cattle feed and people food will cost dramatically more.  So farmers are switching to growing corn, which is water intensive and soil depleting, to sell to ethanol plants and not to anyone else.

  4. Good editorial (with exception of the Ethanol part).  Transportation fuel is a difficult puzzle to solve - it requires changing lifestyles that we have become accustomed to.  

    As an aside, while taxes may be 1/2 the price of fuel in some countries, the US federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, and states add anywhere from 8 to 32 cents per gallon.  At most, state and federal tax would be about 50 cents a gallon... 1/7 of 3.50/gallon fuel in the US.

    I suppose they could reduce the federal tax by the amount they are subsidizing the oil industries - but the price of gas would just go up to keep oil company profit the same.  If the federal government just cut the tax, where would they cut spending to make up the difference?  Or would they raise taxes elsewhere?

    Oil is just like any other product - any company will make as much profit as they can - the nature of any business - hamburgers, jeans, gasoline.  Basic supply and demand.  If demand drops, the price will go down.  If taxes are reduced (artificially lowering the price) consumption will go up, and oil companies will raise prices to make more money.

    Unfortunately, since demand is increasing world wide, expect the price to keep going up.

  5. We should drill our own reserves.  We have enough known reserves to get us from importing anymore oil, we just lack the political will to get it.

  6. It is funny to hear anyone talk of the record oil company profits  but NOT ONE tells you that about 1/2 of the price of a gallon of gas is from federal,state,and local taxes. Next time any politician talks about gas prices or the economy, ask him  why, if he really gives a hoot about the price of gas, doesn't he try to remove all the taxes from the gallon of gas? Or ask him how much oil stock he owns.

    Think ,people,think.

  7. like many anti big oil pundents, there is enough truth to make people mad at the oil companies, but that is all. with india and china buying crude oil at $100 per barrel on the world market, do you really think that if the US went to OPEC and said we will pay you $75 per barrel that OPEC would sell us oil? dont kid yourself. second, with the US dollar tanking against other currencies, we have to spend more for the same imports. third, if we truly want to make this country energy independent, then we need to tell the environmentalists who dont really care about this country anyway, to go pound sand, and start drilling where we know the crude oil is, off the california and florida coast lines for instance, before china and cuba decide to drill there and take the oil we should be getting. we need to drill in the ANWR, and we need to develop our oil shale reserves.

    contrary to popular liberal opinion, ethanol is not the answer to our energy needs. in fact there not going to be one end all solution to our energy needs, but rather a multitude of energy sources.

    another problem is that the infrastructure is not in place to support alternative fuels as yet, and it will take some time, and a lot of money, before it will be put in place. remember that the infrastructure for gasoline has been developed over 100 years. you are not going to replace that all at once even if you get all the worlds billionaires together to spend all their money at once to get said infrastructure in place.

    one more thing, even if the US became energy independent over night, OPEC would not be suffering in the least as there are too many other countries buying their oil.

  8. Very little truth in there.

    Supply and demand does have an effect, but it's not the only thing.  We let the Federal Reserve print money out of thin air.  It's not backed by anything.  If you increase the money supply, the dollar loses value (okay, maybe that is a sort of supply and demand).  When the dollar loses value, things rise in price.  Consumers are hit three times:

    1. The price of oil goes up, and people are charged more per gallon of gas.

    2. Companies that truck food to grocery stores have to pay more for gas for the trucks, and they charge food-makers more to ship the food.

    3. The price of food goes up, because the dollar is worth less.

    Ethanol is not a viable alternative.  It takes more energy to create a gallon of ethanol than you could get from a gallon of gasoline.  Plus, there would be less corn for other uses, like food for us, or food for livestock, so it would raise food prices.

  9. Some of it is true - especially with respect to supply and demand.

    However, the supply problems are mostly political, not true supply.   Here in the US we know where there is tons of oil but congress blocks us going to get it due to environmental concerns.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 9 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.