Is this a fair trade for me?

Question

I Send Donovan McNabb, Phi QB

I Send Marques Colston, NO WR

I Send Phil Dawson, Cle K

Receive David Garrard, Jac QB

Receive Roy Williams, Det WR

Receive Adam Vinatieri, Ind K

Receive Troy Smith, Bal QB

Answer 1

Don't  do it!  

You can basically throw Troy Smith out of this deal as he is useless!

So then you have  McNabb for Garrard  - Edge McNabb  

   -     -         -     - Colston for Williams  - Edge Colston

  -     -       -        - Dawson for Vinateri  - Edge Vinateri

You bascically gain nothing and lose alot

Answer 2

Roy Williams and David Garrard are primed for career seasons, but with saying that I don't think they will put up more points than McNabb and Colston!

Phil Dawson is gonna have way more FG chances, while Vinatieri is gonna be kicking a lotta PATs!

Troy Smith is not 100%, and Flacco is the starter in Bal, so he's presently no use!

No Deal! "Close the box on this one homie"

Answer 3

I would not accept a 4-for-3, especially of this sort. You're clearly trading away the superior quality players, although McNabb is good and has a huge name, he has only put up that single stellar season in 2004, and has only played one full season between 2003 and now; even so he is still a good QB when healthy, and has a huge name that you could use as a chip to obtain an even better player to fill what-ever need you have.

On the other hand Roy Williams is a talent, but the hype concerning Calvin Johnson points to him losing looks, coupled with the departure of Mike Martz & his pass-happy offense means his production will likely dip. Garrard is good, I personally like him more than McNabb, but I believe you can do even better in making a package trade including McNabb. Also, Troy Smith as a throw-in is dubious, Joe Flacco is starting for the Ravens, and they have Joey Harrington, Todd Bouman, Chris Simms, and Kyle Boller also vying to play as Flacco's backup, he is not worth pursuing at all, and do not be fooled by Vinatieri, he does play for the Colts and they will get extra-points, but he has not kicked a field goal of over 40-yards since 2006, not so hot. Alternative kickers often on the wire and good options are Robbie Gould and Rob Bironas.

Most importantly, Colston is the #1 receiver in the NFC's most prolific passing offense, and trading him away for such diminutive prospects wouldn't be prudent, I would keep your good players

Answer 4

PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS TRADE...hes why

U are giving up big guys for people who are not fantasy suitable players

McNabb, when healthy, is a fantasy blockbuster...Colston had been huge the last two years in fantasy

Ur only gaining in kickers, which u prolly know do not matter that much...

just cuz ur getting two QBs does not mean u get the better end...i would rather have Mcnabb than those two

Answer 5

NOOOOOOOOOO

Answer 6

absolutely not.

4-3 trade is not good in this case

here are some reasons

Donovan Mcnabb might have a good year this year and even if thats not the case

Marques Colston is a definate stud this year

Vinatarie is actually not a great kicker anymore hes lost some of the spark

Troy smith is a bust

The only thing ur really getting out of this deal is roy williams, who is definately not worth getting if your to give up colston

absolutely not.  

in addition mcnabb and gerrard are valueably the same player not too much difference between the two