Is this a good deal for fantasy football?

Question

i get anquan boldin

he gets willis mcgahee

for RB's i have clinton portis, steven jackson and to take mcgahees spot lawrence maroney or warrick dunn

for WR's i have brandon marshall, roddy white, bobby engram, and bernard berrian

IS THIS A GOOD DEAL

Answer 1

yes you could use another reciever and if warrick dunn can take the open spot u have a good if not better RB to take the spot i say its good

Answer 2

Most people would put : yes.

I Would Say Yes It's A Good Deal. Both On Your Side And His...It depends more on what you have. If he has all but this one card for this "team" and you don't have any for that "team"...no...get it ???

Win win...so yes its a decent deal

Consider, me for best answer?

Answer 3

It's a very good deal for the other guy. While you can afford to give up a running back, you should be able to get a better receiver for McGahee. Boldin may hold out since he's unhappy with his contract.

Answer 4

Mmm. Tough call. On one hand, RBs are simply more valuable than WRs. On the other hand, your WRs really suck. So it may actually be a good deal for you under the circumstances. Just hope that Jackson bounces back and both him and Portis stay healthy. Then it won't matter. Otherwise, you might have some problems. Good luck!

Answer 5

no, its not. Rip off!

Answer 6

only if you want it to be

Answer 7

its not the best deal in the world. but you have 3 great RBs and your WR aren't the strongest. Maybe you could try to get a better WR for him. But if you can't, then i'd probably do it considering how weak your WRs are.

Good luck

Answer 8

Its a good deal as you're trading your 3rd best RB for what would be your 2nd best WR

Answer 9

With your WR's you definitely could use anquan boldin. He's a low #1 high #2 receiver

Answer 10

he got ripped off.

Answer 11

Yes. You'd get WR help (because your WR corps is less than average) and you would be giving up an injury-prone RB.

Answer 12

Not great.  Not awful.

WRs are across the board worth less than a feature back.

McGahee hasn't been stellar, but he gets a lot touches.  They will likely have Flacco or Troy Smith at QB, so that does diminish his value.

Boldin is good, if a bit streaky.

On paper, it feels like you are overpaying.

You have a pretty deep team at RB and I would suggest you keep it that way.

You'll be able to find a rising WR on the waiver wire.  There are a couple every year, just like Marques Colston two seasons ago.

Keep your stable of RBs together for depth and to survive injuries.

Answer 13

This is a tricky one. First off, let me tell you that IN A VACUUM this trade is HORRIBLE. RBs are alot more valuable than WRs in any FFL. However, your team seriously need WR help. I mean those WRs you have are AWEFUL. None of them is a true Number 1 except for maybe Roddy White (and he plays on a hapless Atlanta offense). Boldin is def head n shoulder above these guys. As far RBs, ur team looks good now, but after the trade not so much. 'Action' Jackson is a stud but remember he was injured last year and that Rams O-Line is still in shambles. Maroney is not gonna get alot of points because the Tom Brady and Co. show will continue this year. And Clinton Portis is, well Clinton Portis. Which is a nice way of saying not that good. If I were you I wouldn't do this trade. With 'action' Jackson and Mcgahee on ur team u have possibly two top10 RBs and that will be a s**+tload of pts. Ride it out and then see what WR you can pick up off the wire as the season progresses.

Answer 14

No it is not

Answer 15

Yes it is