Is this a good introduction?

Question

im writing whhy i believe sam sheppard (1954 case) shudbe guilty. tell me if its good nd to add/taske out anything

On the evening of July 3, 1954, Sam Sheppard was accused of allegedly murdering his wife, Marilyn. Sam Sheppard denied any involvement in the murder and stated he had his own battle with a “bushy-haired” man who he said was the killer. Sam Sheppard stated he was attacked by a “bushy-haired” man, who brutally killed his wife and knocked him cold. However, I don’t believe that statement. I have reached the verdict that Sam Sheppard is guilty (Prosecution). The arguments that support my verdict are the following. The blood results were inconclusive. No forensic evidence was found to support Sam’s story. Also, the delay in reporting the murder and inconsistencies in story.

Answer 1

i think it is okay, but you need to elaborate more on your supporting statements.