Question:

Is this a good trade? NBA Teams?

by Guest33920  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2389~3025~3027~3202~3195~881&teams=29~25~25~22~16~16&te=&cash=

is this a good trade or bad trade?

 Tags:

   Report

17 ANSWERS


  1. pretty gud


  2. actually not too bad

  3. well for the t-wolves it not bad b-cuz t-wolves already have a young big man in kevin love and for memphis it not bad either you putting two GREAT player together (o.j mayo/al jefferson)

    for OKC GREAT you are gettin a all-star guard (Roy) and a big man which OKC needs and for Portland It's bad because......well it not bad it's good not great b-cuz u giving a great player away (Roy) BUT u putting Durant/Oden/Aldridge and Bayless together that a great young team that have alot of potential!!!!!!!!

  4. It's not bad, but I don't think these teams want to change who they're building around. I don't think the Timberwolves would like this though since Conley is still unproven and Walker is pretty washed up.

  5. not terrible,reasonable

    only critique is Minnesota doesn't get to much. Your basically trading Jefferson for Conley, you need a little more.

  6. the trades pretty good but is kinda lopsided on both ways. well for the minnesota and memphis one its makes sense for the grizzles cuz they need a big man since the loss of gasol and with mayo and jefferson they could be real good but for minnesota they lose their future star jefferson for a pg that they really dont need and one that may not develop and a veteran player with a big contract.

    for the portland and okc one, i like the move for kd so oden and durant can play together. imagine how dominant theyll be. but i dont think portland is willing to send roy away. both durant and roy were rookies of the year so they can kinda be considered equal cept durant has an edge. so this trade makes more sense though its too drastic.

    all in all, great trades. good job

  7. its okay possible but i dont think kevin is leaving okc

  8. its ok

  9. This is an awful trade, twolves just gave memphis antoine walker, who didnt want to be in minnesota, and the wolves are trying to build around jefferson not get rid of him.

  10. no it's not cause the T'Wolves or not giving up a 20/10 guy for A.Walker which they had before

    however I like how the you traded Roy and Rodriguez for Durant cause the Blazers need a SF and the Blazers can put Bayless at the SG position and put a PG in the PG position

    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/tr...

  11. Seattle gets worse trading away the rookie of the year and Mike Conley is a young point guard who is not going to be traded

  12. Minnesota is getting nothing good in return. Oklahoma City not getting enough for Durant.

  13. only good for portland and memphis

  14. its a great trade for portland, memphis and oklahoma city

  15. good for memphis

    minnesota wont trade al

    portland wont trade roy

    okc wont trade durant

  16. the teams wouldn't trade there young star and Minnesota  just got Al Jefferson they wouldn't trade him its a good trade but i think it wouldn't happen

  17. This trade's not gonna happen in a million years.  Why would OKC trade away their franchise player.  No way

    Minnesota going trade away its best player for Walker and Conley.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 17 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.