"This sentence is a lie." Very famous paradox. If the statement is a lie, then it is telling the truth. But if it is the truth, then it must be a lie.
A while back I was thinking about this statement, and I feel as though I have found a way out of it. First, some definitions:
1. "Truth" means the conformity of the intellect to reality.
2. "Lie" means a communication that describes reality in a way other than it actually is.
Particular things, like Aristotle says in his Categories, cannot be either true nor false. You cannot say, "This horse is a lie," or "This fly is the truth." You have to say something like, "That the horse is purple is a lie". A subject, independent of at least one other predicate, cannot be predicated of "truth" or "falsehood".
"Sentence" is a subject. Unless we can predicate it of something predicable of "sentence" (taken as an independent subject), we cannot meaningfully predicate "sentence" of truth or falsehood.
Is my reasoning good?
Tags: