Is this good scoring for fantasy football?

Question

Roster Positions:

QB, QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/R, W/R, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN

Stat Categories:

Passing Yards (25 yards per point)

Passing Touchdowns (4)

Interceptions (-2)

Rushing Yards (10 yards per point; 6 points at 100 yards; 6 points at 200 yards)

Rushing Touchdowns (6)

Reception Yards (10 yards per point)

Reception Touchdowns (6)

Return Touchdowns (6)

2-Point Conversions (2)

Fumbles Lost (-2)

Offensive Fumble Return TD (6)

Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3)

Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3)

Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3)

Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4)

Field Goals 50+ Yards (5)

Point After Attempt Made (1)

Point After Attempt Missed (-1)

Sack (2)

Interception (2)

Fumble Recovery (2)

Touchdown (6)

Safety (2)

Block Kick (2)

Kickoff and Punt Return Touchdowns (6)

Points Allowed 0 points (10)

Points Allowed 1-6 points (7)

Points Allowed 7-13 points (4)

Points Allowed 14-20 points (1)

Points Allowed 21-27 points (0)

Points Allowed 28-34 points (-1)

Points Allowed 35+ points (-4)

Answer 1

If managers can have a wr or rb in the same spot make those point systems similar.

here is what you have:

Rushing Yards (10 yards per point; 6 points at 100 yards; 6 points at 200 yards)

Rushing Touchdowns (6)

Reception Yards (10 yards per point)

Reception Touchdowns (6)

make it this:

Rushing Yards (10 yards per point; 6 points at 100 yards; 6 points at 200 yards)

Rushing Touchdowns (6)

Reception Yards (10 yards per point; 6 points at 100 yards; 6 points at 200 yards)

Reception Touchdowns (6)

that is the only thing i can see wrong.  try to make those positions even or else people will take advantage rb (if they have enough on the bench) because they can earn more points.

rb will still have a little more of an adv because they can also receive as well as carry but at least it is less and will make managers think more rather than hope someone has a breakout game.

Everything else is good.