Is this really nirbu? ?

Question

Now look before you say no. This guy on youtube found the coordinates and i saw a comment that said the gov took the video down. I dont know if thats true or not but there are copies now. go to wiki sky or google sky and just put in the coordinates 9h 47m 57.0s 13 16' 45.8" Its bright red like the pictures of it say.

WHAT YOU THINK?

Answer 1

The bright red object at these coordinates is the well-known variable star R Leonis. Like most long period variable stars, R Leonis is a deep red colour.

This is the sort of "discovery" which we get when people who don't know much about astronomy start trying to identify objects in places like Google Sky.

Answer 2

I put the coordinates into Google sky, and yes, it looks red. But it therefore cannot be a planet. It is a star, a red star. Planets do not look that bright or that red. Whatever it is, it is giving off its own light, so it is either a red giant or red dwarf.

If Niburu exists, which is not likely, it would be visible in even small telescopes by now, and no government could stop anyone buying a $20 telescope to look at it themselves.

If you want to believe someone on youtube who says that he is important enough to be noticed by the government to have his "evidence" removed, then that is you choice. But for me, claims of government coverups are just some peoples way of trying to increase the credibility of their ludicrous beliefs.

.

Answer 3

don't you think if google can see it, scientist's could see it as well?

given this assumption, wouldn't it be likely that alot more scientist's (and more importantly, scientist's from the RESPECTED side of the community) popping up warning us?

govt.'s has tried and failed many times in the past to cover up knowledge as 'huge' as this... and pressumabely, all have failed to maintain secrets (area 51 for example, was supposed to be a secret base but ended up becoming a 50+ year downright lie, the govt. repeatedly dismissed it's existence until 2003 or 2004.... EVERYONE knew it was there, even tho there were alot of 'sheep' that took the govts. word at face value and called those who believed in it crazy)

if there was any risk from this particular 'threat' you would know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that it was a risk, you woudln't be here asking this question, you would be preparing to die.

Answer 4

FAQ Odometer updated (since 08/28/08)

Doomsday: 12

Apollo Hoax: 1

Answer 5

The problem is that we know who invented the Nibiru legend (and when) and who hijacked the legend to force the fictitious planet to participate in the Big 2012 Hoax Off (after, of course, forcing it to participate in the 2003 end-of-the-world).

Even the guy who created the legend is fed up to see Nibiru involved with the Big 2012 Hoax Off.  According to his calculations (which he re-did and re-published -- because he still believes his made-up story) Nibiru is not due here until at least 2085.

So, without looking, we know the answer is no, it is not Nibiru.

I did check a few planetarium programs and none of them show anything special around that position.  Perhaps a few red giants stars (the sky is full of them if you look for dimmer stars), but they are not rare.

Answer 6

Sorry Desmond.  No such thing.  Even though you did not include the link.

Answer 7

it's a star. so what?

i think you are setting new standards for gullibility.

Answer 8

Got yer back this time, Bob-a-roo!