Is xno1rafafanx, can be any stupider?

Question

If Nadal really had a blister that started from sunday, then explain me how he won David Ferrer in the final with the blister? Please yes, Nadal has a point that the ATP calendar is crazy, and I agree, but come on. If Nadal really had an injury, I don't think he would be able to win a single game on Ferrero yesterday. Nadal fans, sop being stupid that the statistics don't lie. Federer is #1 and will keep for this year, but I think he will lose in Wimbledon, because he would be trying to win Wimbledon for the 6th time, and somebody I think will beat him, but Federer will probably reach the semis and final. Maybe he will defend most of the points at this year's Wimbledon.

Answer 1

Blisters get worse once you irritate it, so I'm in no position to comment on nadal's foot, but I did read someone say it was real bad, and it was commendable that he continued fighting. Please expand on Federer not winning wimbledon "because he would be trying to win Wimbledon for the 6th time, and somebody I think will beat him". I guess the more you win, the worse you become? If he is beaten, then either he didn't play his best, or someone new came on the tour, because he is the best (on grass). The big servers should have some fun.

Answer 2

Ever played tennis or run or walk with a blister??? It hurts.

And I would suggest it hurts more than a sore throat!!!

And I would suggest the ATP do something so these athletes aren't destroying themselves by cramming all these tournaments in every year.  

There are certain players that are so fun to watch...Federer, Nadal...I loved Conners Bjorg and McEnroe too.  .. But I sure would rather watch them longer than just a few seasons!!!  Guga is a great example of the damages that are done.

Answer 3

You say that Nadal wouldn't be able to take any games off Ferrero if he was injured.

Well it just goes to show how good he is and/or how pathetic the likes of Ferrero is. He's been winning the French Open ever since he came onto the scene. Has your Federer been doing that on grass? He had to make atleast 5 appearances on grass before starting to win. So, just shut your mouth about Rafa. He doesn't need to prove anything to idiots like yourself.

Answer 4

anna, shut up your so stupid. You  compare Novak to a baby eagle KEEP YOUR OPINIONS TO YOURSELF.

Nadal has shown that he is human, he can't keep at the top of  clay all the time. Same as Fed on hard courts, they are all humans.

Answer 5

haha Nadal is king of clay but, Federer is king of Tennis!

Answer 6

i agree with pistol....

i hate novak!!!!!

Answer 7

Ok, i guess i should really defend myself for this question. I dont think i can be bothered though. haha Your saying you dont wanna ``offend`` me, well matey i think you`ve did a pretty good job of that by insulting me with this question, broadcasting it to all of our fellow yahoo`ers !!! What do you want me to say ? N.o1 i can except when Nadal loses (your sooo wrong about that, you`ve no idea) when he plays bad he plays bad and the other player ofcourse deserves to win. Yes i feel bad for him but at the end of the day if he plays **** he plays ****. Everyone knows that Nadal`s game was limited when he played Ferrero, regardless of your comments Rafa didnt play 100% due to the fact he had a bad blister on his foot he wasnt running the way he would normally. Ferrero, granted played well but theres no chance in h**l if Nadal wasnt sooo tired and didnt have that foot problem he would have won that match. Whether you believe this or not i dont really give a toss all i can say is dont go calling me stupid, you dont even no me!!! This question should get deleted its awful !!! I should be the better person and not retaliate but im pissed off at this, you should think what your saying before you go insulting people.

Answer 8

And Novak is King of Quitting