Isn't sad to see how many liberals outthere that don't see and accept Sarah Palin as a woman?

Question

I told all of you this before in the eyes of a liberal you are not a woman or a non-white person if you are not a Liberal Democrat. Had Palin been selected as the VP for Obama than a woman being selected for VP for the first time would be called "HISTORIC". Also in addition Palin would be considered "the representative for all women" in the United States, now she is being referred to not as a woman but a traitor to women.

Would someone make these liberals understand that they don't speak and represent all women and minorities, plus to expand on one of MLK's dreams where people are judge more based on content of character?

P.S. Don't try to say that I'm a hypocrite that I don't judge others by content of character since I go by the saying of what goes around comes around. If you liberals continue to label others other will continue to label you.

Answer 1

You're the one drawing attention to her gender. All I see is a former mayor of a podunk village and two year governer of a sparsely populated state.

But of course, now the Republicans LOVE lack of experience!

Answer 2

WTF are you talking about? Who said she's not a woman? And who said it's not historical except you? Sources?? You seem to forget there was already a woman on the ticket once before.

Answer 3

Love it.. Loved your question.. Libs sux!  You shut them right the h**l up.. This happens when you ask a questions that they don't know how to respond too.  They lose their ability to think clearly.

Answer 4

Actually, I'm a woman, a feminist, and a liberal Democrat. Even though I'm not voting for McCain, I don't view Palin as a traitor to her s*x. Believe it or not, but I don't expect all women or all minorities to think alike!

Answer 5

She would be the first woman selected to run as VP if you had a time machine and went back to 1984 and erased Geraldine Ferraro.  While you're there could you pick me up a new Nintendo NES?  Mine's broken.