Isn't this a good trade?

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=25~3211~2983~2015&teams=22~22~23~23&te=&cash=

plus the kings will receive future 2009 and 2010 2nd round pick from the blazers.

Answer 1

The Kings would deffinately get the better end of the deal.

But I don't think it's realistic because the Blazers are trying to distance themselves from trouble makers like Artest,and being jokingly called the Jail Blazers....lol

~G()()d Luck!~

Answer 2

first off you need to put who it is a better trade to. If you didn't add the draft picks then the blazers would have gotten a better deal. Hawes was the 10th overall pick in 2007 and Artest brings in the fans. Aldridge may not be as good as he was projected to be. Outlaw is a good bench SF, but not worth $4 milion. It all depends on if the teams would actually trade it because Hawes and Artest both are Free Agents in 2009. This would be a trade that you must follow and care about to find out if it works.