It has been said that the February Revolution was "leaderless" Why?

Question

It has been said that the February Revolution was "leaderless" Why?

Answer 1

This revolution appeared to break out spontaneously, without any real leadership or formal planning. The tensions which had for so long been building up finally exploded into a revolution, and the western state of Petrograd (the City of Saint Petersburg prior to the war) became the focal point of activity. An illustration of just how large Russia was is that it took some years for eastern parts of the country to realise that a revolution had actually taken place.

I suspect you know which revolution this was, but since no one else seems to, I'll point out that it was the Russian revolution of 1917 which included the abdication of Tsar Nicolas III.

Answer 2

Werent the Germans leaders

PLZ ANSWER:http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

Answer 3

is it not self-explanatory? But the revolution that followed did have a leader shipped by Germans from Switzerland.