Just based on the Wrestling, which company is better; ROH, TNA or WWE?

Question

Which do you pick, based on just the Wrestling, ROH, WWE or TNA?

Also, why?

Thanks!

Answer 1

ROH ROH ROH ROH

Answer 2

For ACTUAL wrestling, I would watch RoH. They've simply got the better skilled wrestlers to actually put on a great match and they've got the best wrestlers not signed by TNA or WWE

Answer 3

WWE

Answer 4

TNA has better matches on a weekly bases, I can't say about ROH because i only saw select matches on Youtube, and WWE is more entertainment based then wrestling. So I'm gonna go with TNA

Answer 5

wwe its got better superstars and its more entertaining  

Answer 6

TNA in wrestling, i barely started watching it this month and it doesn't have as many squash matches as wwe has been having at the moment  

Answer 7

OH MY GOD [[Hannah Hardy]] Is Back!? Welcome back.

TNA(only,because i have yet to see Ring Of Honor,but i'm tryin' to(lol give me a break guys i have dial-up lol)

*Waits for the thumbs down from WWE marks*

Edit:I meant that i have yet to see the boys & girls of ROH wrestle,and as for the dial-up comment i said as sayin' YouTube was not the best option for ROH videos.

Answer 8

WWE i dont need to give a reason because it speaks its greatness for itself

Answer 9

I pick TNA. I think the matches are a lot longer and better. Also, there is more wrestling one TNA. I don't watch ROH, so I can't judge it. WWE is getting a lot better with the wrestling but it still has a lot of commercials and a lot of promos

Answer 10

definetly wwe cuz it has better superstars

i watch both

Answer 11

ROH hands down...it has nothing to do with money, entertainment and everything else these other answers have..this promotion has the best wrestling action period.

Answer 12

ROH, better techinical wrestling displayed. Plus they aren't afraid to put on a good heel vs heel match, or let an up and comer defeat former world champions.

The thing that really puts them on top is that they treat the Tag titles as World titles like they should be.

Answer 13

ROH definitely has better technical, submission, hardcore, and high flying wrestling today ROH seriously needs to get a television deal soon

Nice question hannah hardy

Starred

Answer 14

It has to be TNA, I can't judge ROH cause I never seen it, and it can't be WWE because they always make the wrestlers limit their moveset, where in TNA you can a unlimited moveset.

Answer 15

It depends on what factors you bring into play, like match length and booking.  If you're basing it off of good wrestlers, I'd say TNA, although I find a lot of their finishes diluted, and a lot of their matches cut too short, but I could also say the same about the WWE in some instances.

I'm really not a big fan of what ROH has become in the past couple of years.  The only mainstay wrestlers there I can even fathom to watch anymore are Jimmy Jacobs, Austin Aries, Brent Albright, The Briscoes (to a degree), and Adam Pearce.  I like Larry Sweeney as well, but I don't consider him synonamous with ROH.  I've went on my tirades about Danielson's overrated status in the past, so I'll spare you the details, sufficive to say I just don't think he's a good storyteller in the ring, and find him to be nothing more than a technical spot monkey.  Nigel McGuinness is a solid worker, but also overcredited in a lot of ways.

If it came down to watching one promotion for the rest of my life above all else, the pecking order of choices would probably go TNA first, WWE second, and  Chikara third.  I'll admit that Chikara has it's sketchy workers, like Shane Storm and Brodie Lee, but they also don't take themselves too seriously, which is one thing that drove me away from ROH, how everyone believes that their little independent is the best wrestling promotion in the world.  It's not so much that I hate the wrestlers for conveying this emotion in-character, but when fans start to preach the same elitist c**p after drinking Gabe's kool aid, it really does make me sick to my stomach.

Answer 16

WWE for Drama and Entertainment

TNA for Talent and Action

and ROH  for a mixture of all 4

Sorry I wasnt paying attention so WWE.

Answer 17

wwe all the way better superstars better everything

Answer 18

its not that i dont like the other industries....But...i like WWE BETTER!!

<EDIT> i understood every word you said :D

Answer 19

well i like wwe

tna not so much

and for ROH i have never seen it

Answer 20

TNA is the best because they have amazing talent & they use them properly.

ROH comes in at #2 because it's where a lot of the top stars in the industry cut their teeth & it is an awesome promotion

WWE is #3 because their Legends laid the foundations for the huge array of talent seen all over the world.  

Answer 21

ROH because they use Japanese wrestlers.

Answer 22

well heres the thing. wwe have gr8 wrestlers but there creative team consistently fail to create entertaining matches during raw, ecw, and smackdown. But they do throw up the odd amazing match at a ppv which would beat the tna/roh main event any day

But on a consitent basis , tna. Fast And Furious matches there great

But wwe are supeirior in every other department

Answer 23

wwe because it has more money and resources

Answer 24

When it comes to pure wrestling ROH. But personally, I'm actually liking CHIKARA a lot more than ROH these days. However, nothing in my opinion is better than Pro Wrestling NOAH in Japan.

Answer 25

WWE I think TNA is boring and I've never heard of ROH