Ken Shamrock in his Prime VS Chuck Liddell Now - Who Wins?

Question

And why?

Thanks everyone.

Answer 1

Lidell why? Because he beat Cotoure twice in his prime.  And Cotoure in his prime is better than Shamrock in his prime IMO

Answer 2

Liddel would win via KO - Shamrock was great at the takedown and those wicked ankle locks/heel hooks.  But Liddel has awesome takedown defense and is a much better wrestler than he shows (I think he was a Division 1 guy back in the day).  

Look at Chuck's takedowns against Wanderlei Silva - and look at his takedown defense against Couture...Liddel is built to counter everything Shamrock has/had.

So I'd definitely say Liddel by KO.

Answer 3

as much as i like shamrock, even in shamrock's prime Liddel would win,

Answer 4

Ken was a MONSTER in his prime.

I'd say Ken via submission.

Answer 5

liddell  

Answer 6

Chuck his stand up is to good , and ken could not get him to the ground.

Answer 7

No doubt that if the fight got to the ground, Shamrock has the advantage (despite Liddell being very underrated on the ground) but personally I just dont think Shamrock, in his prime, has the ability to take Chuck down.

Chuck has incredible takedown defense, and good striking. Liddell would win by TKO, in my opinion.

Answer 8

Liddell.  He had better stand-up than Shamrock, and of course, some of the best takedown defense mma has ever seen.  I would have Liddell thwarting takedown attempts and getting a TKO in the third.

Answer 9

mmm i reckon chuck !!!

chuck has good take down defense n by the time ken try's to take him down he would get knocked out  

Answer 10

Shamrock would be able to lock in an Ankle lock for a Submission.

This would be quite the fight to watch though.

Answer 11

Ken Shamrock by submition. I think people need to watch Ken in Pancrase where he was a freakin destroyer. He's stronger than Lidell, and I think he could take him down. Shamrock beat Bas Rutten twice, I think he could take Lidell.