Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School - Evolution?

Question

Do you agree with the judge's ruling:

"For human artifacts, we know the designer's identity, human, and the mechanism of design, as we have experience based upon empirical evidence that humans can make such things, as well as many other attributes including the designer's abilities, needs, and desires. With ID, proponents assert that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer's identity, do not propose a mechanism, and the designer, he/she/it/they, has never been seen. In that vein, defense expert Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects, we know the identity and capacities of the human designer, but we do not know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life."

-Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, page 81

Answer 1

I agree that Intelligent Designers have not made much progress.  Whether there is no designer or it is impossible for us to tell, one thing remains clear:  ID is more of a religious topic than a science one, and deserves no place in a public school's science class.